Posted on 01/17/2018 7:45:32 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
But, DDT doesn’t kill, it is used as a deterrent (think DEET). The vector mosquito doesn’t land on any surface coated by DDT. Domiciles, bedding and netting were sprayed and the mosquitoes wouldn’t stick around.
If mosquitoes couldn’t bite malaria infected humans, it couldn’t be passed on. DDT controlled the vector to control malaria.
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
Thanks!
Thanks for the information. I thought the DDT killed them. I learn something new every day.
It seems to me, you can either believe in Darwinian evolution, or you can oppose “climate change”, but not both.
If you believe in evolution, then “climate change” is just another change in the environment that we should adapt to, and if we can’t adapt, we are an inferior species and should be supplanted. If you oppose “climate change”, then you must be ascribing some special mystical quality to the human species that you would want to tailor the planet specifically to their needs in order to preserve them from that natural weeding out process.
I use the example of man's creation of satellites....made of parts...that have to be constantly "monitored".
Then I look at God's "satellites"...the stars....living sources of energy and awe.
Man is so vain!
Scott Pruitt's right... 'climate scientists' are wrong. It's really that easy.
The climate charts I've seen look anything BUT stable!
As expected, the scientists cannot answer the queastion.
Use ° or ° where the degree symbol should be when posting to FR.
In other words, 100°C is typed as 100°C
FRegards!
Texas Tech’s Katharine Hayhoe agreed, noting that human civilization has developed in the relatively stable climate “of the past 10,000 years”
10K years ago in the South there were Balsam Firs growing in SC. Today they’re constrained to only the climate of the higher elevations in the Blue Ridge and Smokies.
Stable? What about:
Boreal (age)
Neolithic Subpluvial
Older Peron
Middle Bronze Age Cold Epoch
The Roman Warm Period.
The Little Ice Age.
The agenda driven ignorance of climate change propagandists is stupendous.
Thanks.
“Science uses the scientific method. Climate “science” does not use the scientific method. Any questions?”
Pfft...The children are gonna die. We don’t have time for the scientific method....
The ° symbol is copied from word
In Word, go to Insert, symbols, ° , Copy then paste to Free Republic
Meanwhile, the average could change, but if local fluctuations were minimal, it would not cause suffering. e.g. what if the poles got a lot warmer and the equator got a lot cooler Imagine the entire surface averaging, in any one location, between 60 and 80 degrees during the summer. We might have less land mass, but it would be a veritable paradise. And condos in Antarctica would be the rage, and vineyards in Siberia.
There is a second part of this line of thinking...
Once you pin down an exact temperature, the next question is, “What exactly do we need to do to get to that temperature.”
Once you have that answer you can determine if it is worth it or not.
You’re welcome. I didn’t know if you were looking for HTML code for the degree symbol, or to copy it over from your computer somehow.
There are several ways to accomplish the same purpose.
Thanks. I do remember Mann being a donkey’s sheath. I don’t remember what finally happened about that suit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.