Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
The whole "hookup culture" nonsense is derived from "sex-positive feminism," whose claim is that, since men and women are exactly the same except with different plumbing (wrong!), women ought to be able to engage in limitless promiscuous sex with strangers just like (some, not all, maybe not most) men do.

Surprise, surprise, surprise -- this results in women being used and treated like disposable sex objects, and many of them don't like it.

Here's a clue: if the results stink, maybe the premises are wrong. Maybe men and women aren't alike "except for plumbing". Maybe our sexual behavior evolved, not to amuse us, but to propagate the species, and maybe propagating the species places profoundly different demands on women and men. Maybe that means that men and women have a very different approach to, and understanding of, sex.

And this should be blatantly obvious to anyone with an ounce of brains, but the feminist ideologues who rule our culture and especially our universities don't have even that.

10 posted on 01/17/2018 6:01:50 AM PST by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
Surprise, surprise, surprise -- this results in women being used and treated like disposable sex objects, and many of them don't like it.

Here's the brutal reality. Men want sex. Women want Alpha males to commit to them. Women give sex (but only to the most desirable high-status men they can get). Alpha males accept the sex, then disappoint the women by not committing.

Here's the reality, ladies: in a promiscuous environment, yes you CAN get a desirable man to go out with you. But only if you offer no-strings sex. He's not going to commit to YOU, if there are a dozen other women willing to replace you in his informal harem.

In the old system, the "patriarchy" which women despised, it was different. Patriarchy does not mean "rule by men". It means "rule by FATHERS", which is a very different thing. Fathers used to control who got to court their daughters, and used to restrict access to men who were likely to marry them and support them. This upset girls, because so many exciting cads were excluded, but served to maintain social stability.

17 posted on 01/17/2018 6:15:18 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Campion

A corollary to all that drives both the push for “choice” and “AIDS research”.

There are lots of people out there who want to engage in wanton sexual promiscuity without any concern about adverse consequences.


25 posted on 01/17/2018 6:56:25 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Campion

You are exactly right.

That is illustrated by “Grace” even though she doesn’t realize it. She tried to behave in a manner that she assumed men do about sex. She didn’t get the emotional satisfaction that her woman centered personality, obviously unbeknownst to her, expected.

She blamed her lack of understanding of her nature on him, for not understanding her nature.

Her “tears on the way home” are of self disgust over the lack of emotional bonding that she is denying herself with her unwomanly behavior.


38 posted on 01/17/2018 7:37:15 AM PST by mom of young patriots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson