Skip to comments.
Norwegian citizen gets cancer treatment in U.S. [Norwegian government refuses to pay for it]
jimmyfund.org ^
Posted on 01/14/2018 4:21:10 AM PST by grundle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: kagnew
I bend my knee in gratitude every morning.
May Almighty God bless and keep our Free Republic!
22
posted on
01/14/2018 6:35:06 AM PST
by
SirLurkedalot
(10/10/51-7/7/16 RIP Dad, I'll be missing you until I cross over to Eternity)
To: Dr. Sivana
I image her treatment is paid for by the same people who pay for the medical care of illegal Mexicans.
23
posted on
01/14/2018 6:52:11 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
To: grundle
[Norwegian government refuses to pay for it]Why should the taxpayers of Norway pay for it?
It's not part of the deal, a deal they freely chose and, AFAIK, are quite happy with.
24
posted on
01/14/2018 6:55:08 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
To: exDemMom
That is good analogy on a few levels. In socialism, people are cattle...
25
posted on
01/14/2018 8:51:29 AM PST
by
NativeSon
( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
To: outofsalt
Clinical trials in Europe is big business
26
posted on
01/14/2018 8:54:36 AM PST
by
NativeSon
( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
To: Balding_Eagle
I image her treatment is paid for by the same people who pay for the medical care of illegal Mexicans.
State taxpayers? I hope not. She is a doctor. I hope she is paying for it, even if she has purchased an insurance that gives her some discount.
27
posted on
01/14/2018 8:56:04 AM PST
by
Yaelle
To: Max Tactical
The therapies would have made it through the first rounds of clinical trials. It’s not like going to mexico for a latte enema treatment.
28
posted on
01/14/2018 8:58:07 AM PST
by
NativeSon
( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
To: outofsalt
However, I have heard some people say that Europeans are the FDA's favorite lab rat. For the most part, drugs are tested on the expected patient population. So if you want to have a drug approved in Europe, you have to test it there. Even if it is already tested in the US.
29
posted on
01/14/2018 8:59:36 AM PST
by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: outofsalt
However, I have heard some people say that Europeans are the FDA's favorite lab I am not so sure about human clinical trials but when I worked for a pharmaceutical (granted in finance not on the science side) I saw a lot of invoices for animal trials from companies in located Europe, many in the Netherlands mostly monkey and beagles. I am not sure why that was or if that has changed since the early 2000s. We did have a small animal lab (small in both the size of the lab and as in the size of the animals mice and rats) in our facility in Baltimore.
To: Sacajaweau
31
posted on
01/14/2018 9:29:39 AM PST
by
grundle
To: gattaca
Socialized medicine works fine if, you are over 15 and under 45, have something that can be fixed quickly and cheaply.
If you are outside that age bracket or you have something that will require long term treatment you are out of luck. Go die you useless eater.
32
posted on
01/14/2018 9:33:42 AM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
To: Yaelle
I’m with you, I hope not also, but I’d say the odds are very high that taxpayers are footing the bill
33
posted on
01/14/2018 10:20:19 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
To: exDemMom
I look at socialist vs. free market health care coverage as analogous to veterinary medicine for livestock vs. pets. Ranchers want the biggest bang for the buck, so they invest in preventatives like vaccines, but spend very little if an animal develops a more serious disorder. Pet owners, OTOH, care less about the expense and more about a positive outcome, so they are willing to spend much more than the rancher on care for individual animals. That is a picture of the relation of the individual to the government vs. the relation of the individual to his family. The family places value in the individual, beyond the numbers. The government bureaucrat places value on his own family, other individuals not so much.
34
posted on
01/14/2018 11:40:17 AM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
To: shibumi
Blast you for making me laugh with cracked ribs.
35
posted on
01/14/2018 12:08:31 PM PST
by
Salamander
(And Ezekiel Smiles Again....)
To: Sacajaweau
That is excellent. It will be interesting to see what happens in Norway in the future when the oil money starts to decline and if they take in hordes of Muslims. So much for their socialist happiness.
36
posted on
01/14/2018 8:56:12 PM PST
by
Pining_4_TX
(For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind. ~ Hosea 8:7)
To: grundle
Death Panels:
Sorry, it is not economical to save your life
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson