At least it's not Barron testifying.
To: Eleutheria5
2 posted on
01/11/2018 4:31:06 PM PST by
Terry Mross
(Liver spots And blood thinners..)
To: Eleutheria5
Bannon has made some terribly accusatory statements of Russia interactions with members of the Trump administration.
At one point, however, he called the Russia thing ridiculous, that collusion never happened. So, which Bannon will show up???
Who can bet what Bannon will say next, or to whom he will say it. At best, Bannon has proven to be unreliable.
3 posted on
01/11/2018 4:32:24 PM PST by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public education & academia= the farm team for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
To: Eleutheria5
This plays right into his overinflated sense of self importance.
4 posted on
01/11/2018 4:35:18 PM PST by
proust
(Since a politician never believes what he says, he is quite surprised to be taken at his word.)
To: Eleutheria5
It would be much much better if Barron, not Bannon, were testifying.
5 posted on
01/11/2018 4:38:50 PM PST by
edie1960
To: Eleutheria5
I suppose in about three years, the House will get around to investigating the works of McCabe, Comey, and the rest of the zoo we are all hearing about just now.
Strictly delaying tactics.
7 posted on
01/11/2018 4:46:39 PM PST by
odawg
To: Eleutheria5; pookie18
11 posted on
01/11/2018 5:16:22 PM PST by
FrankR
(On the knees is not a good place to be...a man on the knees is only half a man.....)
To: Eleutheria5
WTF is going with this already? Sheesh.
14 posted on
01/11/2018 5:48:12 PM PST by
stevio
(God, guns, guts.)
To: Eleutheria5
Can anyone explain how this level of in depth examination of the 2016 campaign ONLY focuses on Trump when the Hillary side is obviously filled with corruption, bribery, and foreign influence?
19 posted on
01/12/2018 3:20:36 PM PST by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
