‘Sneaky Dianne Feinstein’ Says She Was 'Pressured' to Release Fusion GPS Testimony

Breitbart News ^ | 10 Jan 2018 | Sean Moran

[mairdie]

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) apologized to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) for releasing Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson’s testimony without giving the Iowa senator advance notice.

Sen. Feinstein told reporters on Wednesday, “I meant to tell him, and I didn’t have a chance to tell him, and that concerns me. I just got pressured, and I didn’t do it.”

[mom.mom]

Is what she did, illegal?

[avital2]

let’s see - in a similar situation Nunes had to recuse, undergo investigation. even Steven time, DIFI. Recuse! time to bring pressure to get her off the committee

[tennmountainman]

Refer her to the Justice Department for leaking documents.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Fred, you’re losing it.
.

[mairdie]

>>time to bring pressure to get her off the committee

Wouldn’t she just be replaced with someone more rabid?

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

For you and me and others of the great unwashed but not for the elites.

[DaveA37]

“I meant to tell him, and I didn’t have a chance to tell him...”

Almost as bad as Hitlary’s pat answer, “I don’t recall”. When did Feinstein say she was going to tell him, three, maybe four years from now? A pretty lame excuse from a very “lame” Feinstein.

[JoSixChip]

Where is the ethics investigation like they did to Nunez? Shouldn’t she be removed from the comity?

[avital2]

she needs to get a black eye. and fair is fair. she has jeopardized the objectivity of the committee now. time to make a cause celebre of it.

[ought-six]

That is EXACTLY why she did it!

[Rashputin]

"It was to give certain others their answers . . . "

You hit the nail on the head.

[pfflier]

Yup. This whole thing stinks of a pre-emptive move. Something in the material would be prejudicial to the libs and this move was designed to negate that.

It also puts the document in the public domain and may prevent it from being used legally in any prosecutions because potential jurors would be 'prejudiced" by the disclosure.

[ought-six]

So, what was her own purpose? Please let us in on it, since you know her so well.

[editor-surveyor]

.
I’m no mind reader, are you?
.

[Diogenesis]

If this LEAKER and OBSTRUCTOR of JUSTICE is not
thrown OUT of the Committee by the Senate,
then the Senate will go down another 50% in approval rating
to about 2% approval by Americans who now
think the lying, selfserving Senators
are criminals - each and every one.

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “Something in the material would be prejudicial to the libs and this move was designed to negate that.” <<

OK, describe how.
.

[editor-surveyor]

.
We already know that 75% of the senate are felons.

[independentmind]

There is absolutely no chance that Feinstein will be censured in any way for what she did.

[ought-six]

Then how do you know she did it “for her own purposes?”

You opened yourself up on this one, friend.

[ebshumidors]

I think that’s why she was so easily “pressured”. You don’t make 77 million on her salary. They’ve all been handed that manila envelope at one time or another.