Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: Wolff Book ‘Gossipy,’ Should Not Be Treated Seriously By the Media
breitbart ^ | PAM KEY

Posted on 01/08/2018 5:54:20 AM PST by davikkm

Sunday on CBS’s “Face The Nation,” when asked about Michael Wolff’s book “Fire and Fury,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said it was a “gossipy book” that should not be treated seriously.

Paul said, “I guess my first response this was sort of gossipy book, like Kitty Kelly book back when I was in high school, nobody really believed them. They were treated as sort of like a sitcom or treated as a television show. They weren’t treated seriously by the media.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; gossip; michaelwolff

1 posted on 01/08/2018 5:54:20 AM PST by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Thanks for sticking up for Trump, Rand!


2 posted on 01/08/2018 5:54:36 AM PST by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
From the author's notes at the beginning of the book:

Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. Those conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true.

In other words, he has no idea whether it's true or not.

3 posted on 01/08/2018 5:58:31 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

IMHO, those words would set him up for a lawsuit. I believe that the cease and desist order from President Trump was the first step in the lawsuit.

The book is not gossipy....it’s a clear attempt to direct the impeachment attempt to the 25th amendment. The left must be getting hysterical with fear because of all of the investigations and what is going to turn up on them. They are frantic to put a stop to it any way possible.


4 posted on 01/08/2018 6:06:06 AM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Who funded Wolff’s “investigation”?

Who authorized his WH visits?


5 posted on 01/08/2018 6:10:01 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I believe it’s known that Bannon sponsored Wolff, but the White House Chief of Staff is the actual gatekeeper. That would have been Reince Priebus.


6 posted on 01/08/2018 6:17:24 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Wolff’s book barely rises to the level of a Kitty Kelly book.


7 posted on 01/08/2018 6:21:00 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Why all the “head-scratcher” questions? We know right away it was Steve Bannon who let the the Wolff in the door.

I suspect that a lot of Michael’s work was done on spec, with little if any advance funding. Once he had his notes, he shopped them around and got the go-ahead to publish, expenses paid for him.


8 posted on 01/08/2018 6:23:43 AM PST by alloysteel (Sometimes I have to tell myself, it just isn't worth the jail time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And yet the media will treat the entire book as fact.


9 posted on 01/08/2018 6:29:05 AM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
In other words, he has no idea whether it's true or not.

Worse than that, he made them up. Someone could fabricate a book of complete BS and so long as it cast a bad light on The Donald, liberals would consider it gospel and the foundation for impeachment.

10 posted on 01/08/2018 6:31:02 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

Never-Trumper porn.


11 posted on 01/08/2018 6:46:08 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Supermarket check out stand tabloids now coming out in hardback. How far America has fallen.


12 posted on 01/08/2018 7:03:10 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (2017 - The year the liberals' "sexual revolution" strikes back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

The media loves gossip it’s how they obtain their stories fiction is easier to write than facts.


13 posted on 01/08/2018 7:35:51 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

The book is simply made up.


14 posted on 01/08/2018 8:22:58 AM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

And actually the msm is not taking this pile of dung very seriously because they KNOW they dont want this imicile’s ravings tied around their neck.


15 posted on 01/08/2018 9:00:49 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism us truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson