Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarvinStinson

“Another post by a pothead contingent legal “expert.”

Answer me this one, Scooter:

If a Constitutional Amendment was required to ban alcohol why is one not required to ban marijuana?

I’ll wait.

L


19 posted on 01/05/2018 6:51:01 AM PST by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

Get the DEA and the US Controlled Substances Act to explain to you.


39 posted on 01/05/2018 9:44:51 AM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
"If a Constitutional Amendment was required to ban alcohol why is one not required to ban marijuana?"

That's easy. Because drunken potheads are more stupid than drunks.


86 posted on 01/06/2018 8:07:55 AM PST by familyop ("...son of a thousand fathers..." -Tuco, "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson