You missed the point. These associations will not have to meet varying state requirements. The Kansas plan will be sold n CA. That is the entire point of allowing associations.
This will most likely be health care insurance not health care spending management.
I didn’t miss the point. I may have just been confused about what the poster was asking. I thought the question was a hypothetical one about the impact of allowing insurers to operate across state lines in all cases, not a question about the new regulation that allows “associations” to insure people across state lines.