Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim 0216

You are simply a loon, or a troll. If the DOJ is Constitutional, so is the Special Counsel, which is entirely within DOJ rules. If the Special Counsel is unConsitutional, so are are all/were DOJ task forces. No court is going to agree.


118 posted on 01/04/2018 1:24:55 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: jjotto

Thanks. Ping to #119!


120 posted on 01/04/2018 1:30:18 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: jjotto
I'll ignore your ad hominem and uncalled-for remarks this time. Next time you'll be enshrined in my "No Fly Zone" list, relegated to the backwaters of nowhereville as far as I'm concerned.

In the meantime, you need put together an actual rational argument.

If the DOJ is Constitutional, so is the Special Counsel, which is entirely within DOJ rules

A constitutional officer or department is very capable of making an unconstitutional rule. It's been going on in earnest for 100+ years. If a DOJ rule is unconstitutional then that unconstitutional rule is null and void. Here, appointing a "special Prosecutor" to investigate the President including his campaign is prima facia violation of the Constitution (U.S. Const., art. I, sec. 2, cl. 5; art. I, sec. 3, cl. 6 - Congress has SOLE power to impeach - which includes going after, investigating, and charging - and try ANY officer including the President).

121 posted on 01/04/2018 1:42:39 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson