Skip to comments.Well Done, Hollywood Left: You Just Got The Second Amendment Totally Wrong (Again)
Posted on 12/29/2017 9:08:02 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
click here to read article
Like all communists, starting with the Soviets and all others that followed, prefer a disarmed public so they can be more easily mass murdered.
Stalinists lie always
Hollywood is pro gun-control because a gun can take the fun out of violent sexual abuse real fast..
These people have invaded every aspect of America.
I’ll make this very simple, because any libtards reading this no doubt need things dumbed down to 3rd grade level. I will not give up my firearms, period. You can try to take them, and yes probably ultimately succeed - but it will cost you, I’ll make sure of that. I will not give up my freedom and liberty cheaply. Ultimately it may cost me everything, so I will make damn sure it costs you.
Good old Red Ed Asner... a communist piece of sh*t still.
Thought he’d taken the Big Choke by now. Too bad.
Added him to my “List of People I Must Outlive”.
But compare the language of the first amendment "Congress shall make no laws" vs. the second: "shall not be infringed". There is no limit to the infringing agency in the second.
Also, look at the Congressional power to grant letters of mark and reprisal. This is the authority Congress can grant to private citizens to make war against the country's enemies. To do this required cannons and Congress wasn't passing those out, which implies the private ownership of the 18th Century's weapon of mass destruction and not merely muskets.
mark -> marque
The last thing anyone in Hollywood wants is for women to defend themselves.
They omit history that tells the full truth.
At the time the 2a was written, every man supplied their own weapon. Which means it was their personal weapon they used when serving in the armed forces. They bought it and owned it.
They used it for protecting themselves from animals and from thieves and murderers as well.
The left ignores this major historical fact because it totally destroys their idiotic arguments trying to distort the 2a.
In other words;
Are You willing to Die
To take My Guns?
Does that sum it up?
The Pennsylvania constitution makes the intent and purpose of the 2nd amendment very clear.
And at the time the 2a was written, all men were expected to own weapons. In some places it was against the law NOT to have a weapon and be of militia age if you were not in a religious denomination that objected to them.
Pretty much. If they’re taken from me, they’ll be empty and hot.
No need to correct yourself! We understood what you meant!
Marque derives from the Old English mearc, which is from the Germanic *mark-, which means boundary, or boundary marker, which is derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *merǵ-, meaning boundary, or border.
I'm shocked, Who would have know. /s
Ed the friendly commie, will never learn, his world is getting smaller, by the day.
Plus, the “militia” referred to were the private citizens, with their firearms, who would stand together against enemies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.