Posted on 12/29/2017 9:07:52 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
He wanted it to get there, so he used FEDEX.
Confusing nadir with apex.
Hahahahahahaha
I suspect abstinence from sodomy would actually be very effective against HIV. That is medically proven. To pay high priced consultant fees to people to deny that as council is a very expensive work program for a few perverts.
Whatever that may mean.
"harmful policies, like abstinence-only sex ed"?? They've pushed 'condoms-only' Sex Ed since the late 1950's, with out success.
Suppose that there was an 'epidemic' of liberals shooting themselves in the side of their head by using a revolver with one chamber loaded, all while in the company of several other like minded individuals. If the suggestion was made, "Stop playing Russian roulette!", would that, too, be condemned as a "harmful, abstinence-only policy"?
Homosexuals and assorted other freaks impacted most !
Still
Not
Tired
Of
Winning
Yet
The author of this piece is obviously a pessimist. 8>)
Okay, got it now. 8>) Me neither.
Well, good. Let’s be real: AIDS is more preventable than the common cold. I can’t stand all this crying and hand wringing over people who refuse to be safe or smart. Whoever invented it, avoiding it is easier than brushing your teeth.
Every last one of these 22 are leftist SJW Rats.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
USPS = United States Postal Service.
I suspect the real story is the council was a hot bed of anti-Trump ‘resistance’. For him to fire them and in the manner in which he fired them, the real story is likely something the enemedia will be reluctant to divulge to the public.
The gay lobby already hates him, so this won’t change anything.
aids is the country’s first PC disease. It was raised to that status because it is self-inflicted by one of the left’s favorite victim groups. Funding was diverted from other causes so as to go to this.
Read the Myth of Heterosexual Aids.
God. I. Love. This. Man.
Treating AIDS is very expensive. Most of that burden falls either on taxpayers or health insurance rate payers. The advent of "civil unions" and forced coverage of same sex "partners" coincides with skyrocketing healthcare costs. We're being scammed to subsidize treatment of AIDS/HIV. Those who were faultless in passively contracting the disease from a blood based product should have remedy against the supplier of the infected material for ongoing support for that assault. Those who recklessly engage in same sex behaviors and abuse of IV drugs should not be getting subsidized treatment. Making the suppliers of the passive infective agents accountable will give them good cause to be a lot more careful.
I demand an apogee!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.