Yes, I do. Each should be heard and then discounted and discredited, as they previously have been.
“I really like what she is doing,”
Last week she said that Trump’s female accusers deserve to be heard. Do you like that?
Her comments in the United Nations do not derive from some inner strength inherent in her; they derive by permission and direction from Trump.
She endorsed little Marco during the primaries.
She sought to prove her inner purity by revising history and removing the Confederate flag. She evidently believes that the novel 1984 is a how-to manual, rather than a warning.
They have been heard, analyzed, found wanting, and dismissed with prejudice...
I don’t agree with her personal actions.
Did you see her personal actions displayed at the U. N.?
She did her job. That’s all I ask of her.
As for saying women should be heard, I agree. They were last year. End of story.
I don’t have to agree with her on everything. She’s doing Trump’s bidding, and that suits me fine.
When she’s out of line, she’s fair game. I think it was inappropriate for her to sound off on the women at this time.
Yes, I do. Each should be heard and then discounted and discredited, as they previously have been.
Where was it?
She is doing what she is supposed to do as UN envoy and is doing it very well. All the rest is arguing about her hair color.