Smashing windows, burning cars, and assaulting people who are merely suspected of disagreeing with you is now considered legitimate forms of political expression - as long as one is a Democrat (see tagline).
Keep you powder dry and your gun clean. It’s not if, it’s when.
Who smashed windows, assaulted people and burned cars?
Was it these defendants, if so, the prosecution had no such evidence, or was it some other people who were not on trial?