Posted on 12/21/2017 11:04:59 AM PST by grundle
Women are more likely to have been sexually assaulted by the age of 44 if they didn’t go to college, according to a new study from the University of Michigan. The study, spearheaded by sociology professor and researcher William Axinn, found that the risk of “experiencing forced intercourse” is more than 2.5 times greater for women who’ve attended little or no college.
After more than six years’ intense focus on a purported campus rape crisis, Axinn’s study exposes the Obama administration’s Title IX regime for the elitist and politically-motivated overcorrection it was. Axinn and his team analyzed data from the National Survey of Family Growth, which asks Americans between the ages of 15 and 44—among other awkward and sensitive things—whether they’ve experienced forced intercourse. And they found that the women most likely to be forced into unwanted sex are the least likely to set foot on campus.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
I believe Mungo Jerry discusses this:
If her daddy’s rich take her out for a meal
If her daddy’s poor just do what you feel
So?
What about Hollywood starlets working with Harvey W?
Cause Liberal universities teach you to spread ‘em for ANYBODY.
The dirty little secret is lesbian rape at college.
Really? I’ll prove you wrong when I bring one of them to Europe or jail..
Well, isn’t that because today college girls consent to sex with anyone?
Judging from the level of masculinity I see displayed by most college males, I think this is absolutely true.
Whatever happened to the FemiNazi mantra that all male-female sex is rape by default?
Not according to them, college women that is. I mean somecarry mattresses on their back because it happens so often!!!
Because liberal college women freely dish it out to every guy, there’s no opportunity they could ever call “rape.”
Don’t forget the majority of liberal women in colleges with a chip on their shoulder. I experienced that first-hand. It’s not attractive knowing that a potential is against before you even say “hello”.
Conversely I find working class women less insecure, more sincere, more worldly and more approachable.
And armed women are a lot less likely to be raped.
A lot more.
Yet the government isn’t calling out for the arming of women. So we know exactly what their concern is. It ain’t safety or freedom.
The phrase “sexual assault” now includes having your bottom patted on the subway, so those statistics are nearly meaningless. I’m glad to see “forced intercourse” specified clearly in a discussion. One is tacky, bad manners, and shouldn’t happen. The other is more than enough grounds for a swift death penalty - delivered by the victim by or her father/brother before the police even catch the predator.
These kind of surveys should not be trusted. The 20% of college women raped statistic is not accurate.
These are mostly self selected samples because many women simply don’t want to talk about this.
“Forced sex” in the survey includes being given alcohol and verbal persuasion.
Good point. Plus the liberal college womyn are more likely to be thinking about it a week later and decide they really didn’t like the way you laughed at that one joke or how your hand might have brushed hers and suddenly realize she’d been raped.
“Do you mind if we dance wif yo dates?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.