To: nickcarraway
What was his addiction, women?
2 posted on
12/18/2017 10:45:34 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
To: bmwcyle
A Woman of Substance.
Or perhaps, a “Substantial” Woman?
3 posted on
12/18/2017 10:47:11 AM PST by
left that other site
(For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
To: bmwcyle
Substance addiction would explain a lot about what’s been happening at ESPN.
7 posted on
12/18/2017 10:48:59 AM PST by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: bmwcyle
What was his addiction, women?
He’s a Democrat so interns would be my guess. He had tremendous power in that job. Nearly all women starting out and wanting a career in entertainment sports broadcasting would have been receptive to his advances.
18 posted on
12/18/2017 11:08:44 AM PST by
lodi90
To: bmwcyle
Ahhh... the dreaded poontang addiction....
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson