Even invited guests have the option to refuse to participate.
Nothing at all to do with Religion or orientation.
it’s called “freedom”
Thank you for posting this article.
Of all the articles I have read here, this one was the most clearly stated and cogently presented without the hyperbole and bombast.
Thanks, again.
Someone walks in and says you are going to bake their cake. Sounds sorta Harvey Weinstein like.
‘It is about being ale to do with choose’
I prefer beer with cheese...
What the baker doesn't want to do is to write a message on the cake for a gay wedding. And the plaintiffs believe they should be able to compel him to write a message of their choosing.
That's obscene - I wouldn't be in favor of forcing Muslim baker to sell me a cake that says "Jesus Saves" either.
Some of what you write I agree with. But there is more to the story. This is primarily an attack on Christianity. The queers have had Christianity in their sick sights for 40 years. 20 years ago the queers barged into churches in San Fransicko screaming at parishioners for attention. At the same time public health was attempting to reign in the rampant spread of more diseases vectored by queers in bathhouses and smelly public bathrooms than anyone ever dreamed. Public health workers were forced to enter the bathhouses, stinking of a mixture of blood and feces, to collect samples from the leavings of these degenerates only to find many of them were carrying and spreading 3, sometimes 5, infectious agents to their coprophilic partners. Young boys, they called twinks, were often molested and infected at the same freak fest.
And more broadly, consent is the basis for a government of the people, for the people, and by the people.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the — CONSENT — of the governed.”
—Declaration of Independence
We have reached the point at which our Government has committed “a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing... a design to [place us] under absolute Despotism” and “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”
We need to start asking ourselves a simple question when our government acts or fails to take action:
Did I consent to this?
I, for one, did not consent.
It would send a strong message if a million plus armed citizens visited Washington with signs that read “we did not consent.”
Next will be a requirement that dating sites allow “transgenders” to put their profiles among the sex they “identify” as, and regular people being unable to exclude them from match searches.
are the pro cake baking arguments based more or less on the greensboro, nc lunch counter protest arguments? (dunno)