Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daleiden Requests Removal of Judge from Undercover Video Case Due to His Ties to Planned Parenthood
Townhall.com ^ | Dec 14, 2017 | Lauretta Brown

Posted on 12/14/2017 5:18:30 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom

David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) announced Wednesday that they are filing a new motion in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to request the removal of Judge William Orrick in the lawsuit brought against them by Planned Parenthood, pointing to his ties to Planned Parenthood.

According to Daleiden’s petition, Judge Orrick has "an ongoing and longstanding professional relationship with one of the named Plaintiffs.” Orrick is a founder and officer of the Good Samaritan Family Resource Center (GSFRC), an organization that partners with Planned Parenthood and had a Planned Parenthood clinic incorporated on its premises while Orrick served as secretary and counsel to the organization.

The petition also cites the use of Orrick’s image by his wife in Facebook posts to “endorse inflammatory public statements about the disputed facts of this case – statements that denigrated the principal Defendant in the harshest terms, while lauding Plaintiffs.”

Orrick’s wife used his image in a post that referred to CMP’s undercover videos, allegedly exposing Planned Parenthood’s illegal trafficking in fetal tissue, as “domestic terrorism.”

"Judge Orrick is part of the Planned Parenthood family," Daleiden told reporters on a press call Wednesday.

Daleiden and his lawyers say Orrick and his wife assisted in getting a Planned Parenthood clinic at GSFRC while they served there.

"Judge Orrick's image has been deployed repeatedly online in support of terrible statements referring to the CMP videos as 'domestic terrorism,' literally 'domestic terrorism,'" said Peter Breen of the Thomas More Society, the pro-life legal group representing Daleiden and CMP.

Daleiden petitioned the Supreme Court in August to remove a gag order that Judge Orrick issued barring CMP from releasing additional undercover footage.

“Judge Orrick’s gag order, issued at the behest of Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation, is an unprecedented attack on the First Amendment by a clearly biased federal judge,” Daleiden said at the time. “Judge Orrick even wants to press his gag order in the California Attorney General’s bogus criminal case against me—though he, NAF, and Planned Parenthood insist the gag order only applies to my defense, and not to the Attorney General’s bogus prosecution.”

Daleiden previously filed a motion in June to Orrick’s state-level court seeking his removal but that motion was denied, so he is appealing the decision to the Ninth Circuit.

CMP’s undercover videos, showing Planned Parenthood employees discussing the procurement and sale of fetal body parts, have prompted a federal investigation of the abortion giant by the FBI and the Department of Justice.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) referred Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers to the FBI for investigation in light of the undercover videos last December.

Grassley wrote at the time that the Committee’s findings document “substantial evidence suggesting that the specific entities involved in the recent controversy, and/or individuals employed by those entities, may have violated that law. Moreover, that evidence is contained entirely in those entities’ own records, which were voluntarily provided to the Committee and are detailed in the report.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; plannedparenthood; religion; righttolife
Full title: Daleiden Requests Removal of Judge from Undercover Video Case Due to His Ties to Planned Parenthood

It is a good indicator of the of the judge's character when he didn't recuse himself from the getgo.

1 posted on 12/14/2017 5:18:30 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Is there no straight-up judge in N. Calif? This Orrick is the same ahole who blocked Trump’s sanctuary city order. No way he should be allowed to sit on a case with this many ideological overtones.


2 posted on 12/14/2017 5:25:01 AM PST by Migraine ((A smartass who is right can be downright funny. A smartass who is wrong is just a smartass.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

Orrick the Orc and a black robed tyrant with innocent baby blood on his hands.


3 posted on 12/14/2017 5:28:51 AM PST by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Judges that do not recuse themselves found to have conflicts of interest should be indicted for several charges.


4 posted on 12/14/2017 5:36:32 AM PST by rawcatslyentist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

This judge is totally devoid of a moral compass. He has no sense of right or wrong, and the law does not matter to him. He worships at the end justifies the means altar. If he possessed a single fiber of legal prudence in his body, he would have never agreed to hear this case.

All federal judges, before taking a case, should be required to swear that there is nothing in their past that would even appear to compromise their ability to be fair and impartial. If this is later found not to be the truth, then the judge should resign from the bench in disgrace and forfeit his/her pension. These people enjoy lifetime tenure without any accountability to anyone. This is insane, and this judge is the poster boy.


5 posted on 12/14/2017 6:27:52 AM PST by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Orrick is the guy Obama wanted for the Supreme Court.


6 posted on 12/14/2017 8:29:28 AM PST by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson