Another silly story. As a senior citizen and female, I did not immediately think about sexual favors when I heard the report of the POTUS tweet about Gillibrand. She is a U.S. Senator. Why would one think first about a sexual innuendo? It takes a person with a dirty mind [or an axe to grind] to think that.
When I realized a short time later of the double interpretation of the tweet, it seemed ridiculous on the face of it. WHILE KIRSTEN IS AN ATTRACTIVE WOMAN, SHE IS NO MELANIA TRUMP! POTUS and FLOTUS were already married when this situation of Kirsten asking for a political contribution occurred. The fact is Kirsten was after some of the Trump money.
No surprise and undoubtedly true
You know what is Hilarious...I don’t know what makes me pay attention to silly details...Just like Barky used to wear black pigment makeup on certain occasions,
depending on “the Message”... she wore false eyelashes Tv in the AM and then comes out with minimal makeup..no mascara for the news shot of the day while she stomps her foot and accuses PDJT looking like Heidi..
How freaking PATHETIC can you get?