Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a little elbow grease
Last week U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, the judge that appears to have granted Oct ’16 FISA request, is mysteriously recused *AFTER* accepting Mike Flynn plea in the first hearing.

No explanation is given for the recusal or why Judge Contreras waited until after the initial plea hearing.

It would be EXPLOSIVE if it turned out the October 2016 FISA warrant was gained by deception, misleading/manipulated information, or fraud as a result of the Russian Dossier; and exponentially more explosive if the dossier was -in part- organized by the wife of an investigative member of the DOJ who was applying for the FISA warrant; the same warrant that led to the wiretapping and surveillance of the Trump campaign and General Flynn, and was authorized by FISA Court Judge Contreras.

3 posted on 12/12/2017 1:45:04 AM PST by a little elbow grease (I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: a little elbow grease

“It would be EXPLOSIVE if it turned out the October 2016 FISA warrant was gained by deception, misleading/manipulated information, or ......

Explosive, yes. But it ends there. There would be no consequences for any involved. Who has authority to see that offenders are brought to justice? Anyone with authority is as corrupt as these people.

We are no longer a free nation.


22 posted on 12/12/2017 3:20:32 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ( "Free men are not equal, and Equal men are not free".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson