To: ballplayer
Wasn’t “Able Danger” the reason Lt. Col. Shaeffer got in trouble?? I LOVE him!
13 posted on
12/12/2017 2:47:36 AM PST by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Ann Archy
After coming under investigation over an alleged pattern of misconduct while deployed as a staff officer in Afghanistan, Shaffer responded by alleging that the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) failed to properly evaluate intelligence on 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta. Shaffer's allegations subsequently became known as the Able Danger. In October 2003, according to his later statement to Congress, Shaffer told the 9/11 Commission staff director, Dr. Philip D. Zelikow, that in 2000 a DIA data-mining program known as Able Danger had uncovered two of the three terrorist cells eventually implicated in the September 11 attacks. Shaffer reportedly told Zelikow that DIA leadership declined to share this information with the FBI because military lawyers expressed concerns about the legality of doing so. Shaffer also asserted that he briefed Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet on three separate occasions regarding his unit's activities. The 9/11 Commission Report did not mention Shaffer's allegations, but in 2005 and 2006 the Chairman of the House Select Intelligence Committee, Rep. Curt Weldon, publicized Shaffer's allegations in public statements and hearings.
Wikipedia
21 posted on
12/12/2017 3:19:48 AM PST by
a little elbow grease
(I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury.)
To: Ann Archy
Yes it is,I like him as well,wish I could get the original manuscript of his book ,BEFORe the CIA got a hold of it!
43 posted on
12/12/2017 4:01:07 AM PST by
ballplayer
(hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson