Yes, but at the age of 16 she had no idea that DA was part of Moore’s signature, because it wasn’t. He was an Deputy District Atty and would not have used DA in any case. So it does not belong there as it defies the history of the DA letters being part of any signature for Moore.
This is how we know she added the text later (after her settlement was finalized).
I understand. But it’s irrelevant whether she did it to make sure everyone knew it was THAT Roy Moore or she mistakenly added it from some court doc. Doing so makes the signature a forgery. Plain and simple. This article, and many others claim it’s not. They are wrong.