JUDGE ROY MOORE, FALSE ACCUSATIONS, AND THE FOG OF POLITICAL WAR

I have seen multiple posts by people claiming various versions of the following statement: “Roy Moore has been credibly accused of sexual assault by multiple women who have nothing to gain from accusing him. Their accounts have been corroborated.”

This is false on many levels. Anyone interested in living in a fair society needs to call the bluff of ANYONE who posts such statements, even if you like them. You can be professional and objective (not necessarily polite or civil) but you must rebuke people for engaging in this kind of clever deceit.

Actually, I thought most of the women cited had not accused Moore of sexual assualt. That term was conflated with the “outrage” over the age difference between Moore and the women at the time of their encounters.

Since most had said that Moore was well behaved and the women were above the age of consent, “assault” really wasn’t involved, at all.

I thought that initially, there had been two who had claimed innapropriate behavior. (1) the supposed 14 year old and (2) the waitress. The third was a later story about an encounter in his office.

The waitress story has been debunked on several levels:
(1) the purported yearbook signing is quite suspect; attorney unwilling to have the yearbook inpected; ink with Moore’s name in different color
(2) recollections of people from that period cannot corraborate that the “victim” was an employee
(3) the physical description of the restaurant does not match
(4) contemporary policeman disagrees that Moore frequented said restaurant

I saw one post which claimed that the “14” year old had been invited to a high school reunion whose date would put her age much higher. Wouldn’t there be public records to corroborate her age? Haven’t heard much more on her story. Moore says it never happened.

I posted this Tuesday but the rules chopped the format up so that the links didn’t work. Ir was one of the rare times I post an article here. Links has some of the best examples of FR input .

END THOSE DISGRACEFUL LIES ABOUT ROY MOORE

Never Trumpers, drive by media, as well as TV and radio talk hosts were having a field day ignoring the fact that all of the Roy Moore accusers at the time (40 years ago) were of the age of legal consent. Including the one claiming when she was 14* years old. For her accusations are the juiciest. All of which Moore denied. Because they suggested and Moore was actually accused by a group with a very serious charge of being a “pedafile”.and much later that included Illinois GOP governor Bruce Rauner who called Moore that on a early am Ray and John WLS talk show 11/28 ..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3603749/posts *that claim disproved see links below.
A result after the above as those false charges which were being gleefully reported and dwelled on by CNN and the media alphabet soup, as well as never Trumpers. In a touchy feel-ly manner. As if it came off of a never given or made police report which requires a sworn complaint.

All the accusations against Moore originate and are quoted from media sources which support positions like : Abortion, gender sex reclassification, gay marriage, and nullification of religious influence on culture. All of which are solidly opposed by candidate Roy Moore.

Despite that fact and that it has been uncovered that his accusers are working for the Perversion Party and that their accusations are false and politically motivated. Much of it was revealed here in Free Republic by members seeking the facts. The drivebys and the nevers media are not reporting this. but are mentioning one accuser is a “Republican” then when examined turns out to be questionable. After getting the facts posted here why not copy this and email it around and don’t forget to include talk show hosts .

What is discgraceful and worse yet even though these accusations have been solidly refuted frequently reported here through Free Republic reporting sources made by volutneers. The general public relying on media “news” venues including talk show hosts and were not being told what’s been uncovered. .

Bill Cunningham on his Sunday 9 to 12 pm show 11/19 who consistently goes off half cocked never brings up the forged yearbook or the backgrounds on Moore’s accusers but announces he thinks Moore was attracted to teens of consenting age and didn’t do anything illegal.
Ben ? Shapiro substituting for Mark Levine on 11/22 proclaimed he wouldn’t vote for either if he was voting on the Alabama race even though he admitted he knew about the forgery but dismissed it. .

Here is a background on 5 accusers. One works for the perverts that one knows the one who claimed she was 14*. But was actually 16 at the time ?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3603606/posts Restaurant rape attempt accusation disproven http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3607731/posts
Alred charge : Grad book signature a forgery; http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3604591/posts link shows someone named Roy or Ray signed it.Then Moore’s last name was added to it in a blue colored ink. His legal secretary at the time he was a Circuit Court Judge declared it a forgery because her initials; DA, appeared with his signature in that year book. Because she would verify his signature Moore / DA /date only on his court rulings .Which is what that forgery was copied from .http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3608349/posts
It’s been reported that CNN reproduced and showed the page in question in one colored ink; black.

Disciplined ex Gasden police officer Lt Gary accusation claiming that Moore was banned from a local shopping center for skirt chasing cheerleaders and other charges were politically motivated and are lies.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3607059/posts
http://www.britebart.com/big-government/2017/11/30/ (from post by texas fossil)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.