To: Oshkalaboomboom
“Lessig argues that a winner-take-all system violates the Fourteenth Amendment. In particular, he claims it goes against the concept of one-man, one-vote. “
Do it by counties. Whoever wins the most counties in the state, wins the electoral votes for the state.
3 posted on
12/07/2017 10:20:24 AM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(BANNON YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD!)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Anybody state that wishes to do that is perfectly free to do so. There’s nothing in the constitution that permits the feds to impose it on them.
5 posted on
12/07/2017 10:30:39 AM PST by
Bob
(Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Do it by counties. Whoever wins the most counties in the state, wins the electoral votes for the state. Each State should be allowed 2 electoral votes to distribute as they see fit.
8 posted on
12/07/2017 10:34:25 AM PST by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: EQAndyBuzz
“Lessig argues that a winner-take-all system violates the Fourteenth Amendment...This guy wants to declare the constitution unconstitutional: He must be from California.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson