WSJ Editorial Board Calls for Robert Mueller to Step Down After FBI Agent’s Anti-Trump Texts

breitbart ^ | ADAM SHAW

[Grampa Dave]

“We should demand he step down because he ignored sexual harassment reports from agents under his supervision. He created and maintained a hostile work environment. That is the mechanism that is currently the hot topic and has the best chance of working.”

As you noted above, “We need some brave women who were former FBI agents or whatever, who were sexually assaulted under Mulehead or Comedy. Filed complaints and were ignored to step forward.”

[b4its2late]

Yep, sounds good to me.

[MarvinStinson]

Mueller and the Justice Department had kept the information from investigators in the House, and refused to allow Strzok to be interviewed.

[jazzlite]

Good for the WSJ!

[FreeReign]

Wray would not respond- it was a thing of beauty!!

Wray, another Deep Stater who doesn't think that he works for the president.

And he was a late pick too.

[FreeReign]

Congressional (and most government) committees are about as useful as teats on a boar. Their sole purpose seems to be as a signal to donors to direct funds (bribes) toward the right elected jerk. CongressCritter Blowhard is on the Energy Committee and I have energy interests, so I donate to Blowhard’s campaign.

Nunes, Jordan and a few others have been doing good work, working with Trump and exposing the corruption. They are giving Trump reason to fire Mueller, Rosenstein, and a bunch of other Deep Staters.

However, they still have used their power to make arrests for anybody in contempt.

[Avalon Memories]

Far as I know, Congress does not have arrest powers. They would probably have to refer a case to the Justice Dpt. The people you mentioned are really trying, but Congressional investigations tends to be all but worthless in terms of anything concrete happening.

[The Westerner]

I don't understand why WSJ doesn't call for an end to Special Counsel full stop? The Special Counsel itself has no oversight body and sits outside the tri-parte Constitutional system.

[eyedigress]

The FBI is about to take a hit. Liars and Thieves working for Bronco. WSJ needs to tread lightly.

[FreeReign]

Far as I know, Congress does not have arrest powers. They would probably have to refer a case to the Justice Dpt. The people you mentioned are really trying, but Congressional investigations tends to be all but worthless in terms of anything concrete happening.

The committees have been turning up evidence. For example today's revelation about FBI agent Ohr and the dossier.

About Congress having arrest power for Contempt, see the following...

The right of Congress to compel witness testimony is not listed explicitly in the Constitution but has been recognized since the 1790s, when men accused of attempting to bribe a House member were arrested by the sergeant-at-arms and hauled before the House for trial, according to the Congressional Research Service.

Congress, though, has not used its power to arrest and detain witnesses since 1935, instead referring contempt cases to the Justice Department or civil courts.

Link

[FreeReign]

The FBI is about to take a hit. Liars and Thieves working for Bronco. WSJ needs to tread lightly.

I don't see a reason why the WSJ should tread lightly. They are correct about Mueller's investigation.

[eyedigress]

Sessions needs to do this fight and keep the WSJ informed of the progress.

I have had enough of media telling me how to think.

[Avalon Memories]

Interesting info about Congressional arrests. Thank you for it. But gathering evidence is pointless unless something is actually done about what we are witnessing.

[FreeReign]

Sessions needs to do this fight and keep the WSJ informed of the progress. I have had enough of media telling me how to think.

When Sessions recuses himself of everything but the kitchen sink, and leaves Deep State Rosenstein in charge, and Obama appointee IG Horowitz performing a small number of investigations, then of course Sessions has a lot of explaining to do.

[FreeReign]

Interesting info about Congressional arrests. Thank you for it. But gathering evidence is pointless unless something is actually done about what we are witnessing.

If enough evidence is gathered, then they can force a legitimate prosecution. The question is, by who?

[eyedigress]

A serious reflection is required.

Where are we 1 year ago? Where are we now?

[Avalon Memories]

Indeed, the question is by who...and how long will it take them to gather “enough” evidence.

[Billthedrill]

The plan was to force Trump to fire Mueller so the Swamp could follow up with the “obstruction of justice” charge they’ve already been throwing out there, and it will be revealing to see just who in the media has been testing the waters on that one. Trump didn’t bite. Things have turned...interesting...