Lets Wrap This FReepathon Up, Folks!
Posted on 12/06/2017 6:03:40 PM PST by jazusamo
President Trump on Wednesday ripped into Democratic congressional leaders one day before a critical White House meeting, claiming the party is looking to shut down the government with its demands on immigration.
“It could happen,” Trump told reporters at the White House when asked about the chances of a shutdown. “The Democrats are really looking at something that is very dangerous to our country. They are looking at shutting down.”
Trump took aim at threats from some Democrats to vote against a year-end spending deal unless Congress shields from deportation young immigrants in the U.S. illegally.
“They want to have illegal immigrants pouring into our country, bringing with them crime. Tremendous amounts of crime,” Trump said. “We don’t have to have that,” he said. “We want to have a great, beautiful, crime-free country. And we want people coming into our country, but we want them to come on our basis.”
The high-stakes meeting comes a week after the top Democratic leaders, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), abruptly pulled out of last week’s scheduled sit-down after Trump tweeted he could see no path to an agreement with Democrats on spending and immigration.
In a tweet on Wednesday, Pelosi shot back that Trump “is the only person talking about a government shutdown.”
The House, on Thursday, is poised to pass a clean two-week continuing resolution that would fund the government through Dec. 22. The Senate is expected to quickly follow suit before money runs out at midnight Friday.
But Congress’s decision to punt the funding fight another two weeks means lawmakers will have to contend with a host of prickly issues right before Christmas.
GOP leaders have ruled out attaching to spending legislation any immigration deal to protect recipients of the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
Another contentious issue likely to be discussed Thursday in the Oval Office is the GOP’s strategy later this month to fund defense and nondefense programs separately.
House Republicans, led by defense hawks, want to extend defense spending through next September at higher funding levels. Republicans would then fund the rest of the government at current levels through January while they work out a broader deal on an omnibus spending bill.
Trump, who has had multiple phone calls with House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) throughout the week, appears to be receptive to the defense-first strategy.
“The President is pleased that Sen. Schumer and Rep. Pelosi have decided to put their responsibility to the American people above partisanship and attend tomorrow’s meeting, paving the way to fund our government and support our brave service men and women who put their lives on the line every day,” said White House deputy press secretary Lindsay Walters.
“The administration hopes to find fiscally responsible ways to avoid a government shutdown, address the looming sequester and devastating cuts facing our military, as well as fund important domestic priorities that will encourage economic prosperity and keep Americans safe,” she said.
But it’s unclear whether Democrats would be willing to go along with the idea of the defense-continuing resolution package, teeing up another possible showdown when the next round of government funding expires on Dec. 22.
Their support would be crucial in the Senate, where at least eight Democratic or independent votes would be needed to overcome a filibuster.
Democrats have traditionally insisted that any increase in defense spending above budget caps be paired with an increase in spending on domestic programs.
“I would not support that,” Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), who caucuses with Democrats and sits on the Armed Services Committee, said of the defense-continuing resolution package.
House Republicans could just jam the Senate with the defense-first package and dare vulnerable Democrats like Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) and Claire McCaskill (Mo.) to vote against a bill fully funding the military, especially with the escalating nuclear threat from North Korea hanging over their heads.
“Then they can go home and explain why they can’t fund the American military when the House did,” said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), an Appropriations cardinal.
Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), a defense hawk and Afghanistan War veteran, said it’d be a huge political risk for his home state senator, vulnerable Democrat Joe Donnelly, to vote “no” on the defense-continuing resolution package.
“There is broad bipartisan support for fully funding the military as we watch the growing threats we face, especially senators like Joe Donnelly in my state who sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee,” Banks told The Hill. “It’d be hard for him to vote against funding the military.”
Division among Democrats could weaken the party, but it would be an enormous risk for Republicans. They are likely to get the blame if there is a shutdown since they control both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
Congress will also be scrambling to tackle a host of other year-end priorities, including funding to combat the opioid crisis, more money for the hurricane recovery efforts and reauthorizing a popular children’s health program.
Some members are hoping Thursday’s White House sit-down will also produce a deal on top-line spending numbers for defense and nondefense programs — something that had been expected last week.
In the last offer, Republicans proposed a $54 billion increase to defense programs paired with a $37 billion boost to discretionary spending increase for nondefense programs, a top Democratic aide said.
Democrats responded by demanding “parity” between defense and nondefense spending, the aide said.
Democrats may be willing to accept an increase in domestic mandatory spending to make up for a discrepancy between defense and nondefense discretionary spending programs.
Man I love this President.
He pops ‘em one right before the meeting.
DAMN!
Return to regular order. Separate appropriations. No more omnibus bills. No more continuing resolutions.
He is letting them know he won’t be cowed, which is what democrats are used to in dealing with Republicans.
Exactly.
Shut ‘er down!
IMO anything that isn’t a balanced budget is a failure of both sides
Lets Wrap This FReepathon Up, Folks!
It’s fun to watch isn’t it.
I thought this guy would be OK. Didn’t know he would be great. It’s so fabulous to see a Pres that fights for average, everyday Americans not the donor class. (Antithesis of PIAPs.)
No matter who shuts down the government, Repubs will be blamed. But I don’t think anybody cares if the government gets shut down. Shut downs have become status quo. Major yawn.
“Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), who caucuses with Democrats...”
Why is it Independents ALWAYS “caucus” with the Democrats?
Shouldn’t it be 50/50?
I don't know. If the Democrats shut down the government because of DACA, then it would be clear that they are putting the good of illegal aliens ahead of U.S. citizens. I do not think that this would be a winning position. Besides, this time it would be Trump who decides what gets closed and what stays open. Close everything that is beneficial to the Democrats and keep open what benefits the Republicans.
Just my view but I think I’s want it both ways and they’re too much of a coward to caucus with R’s.
They are rats. But they need a little cover when their skin crawls at the thought of supporting some of the rat stuff.
No matter who shuts down the government, Repubs will be blamed.
Because they blame themselves and assume door mat position when Democrats attack.
Last I looked, the GOP held majorities in both chambers of Congress.
The DIMS have no leverage whatsoever and are not needed.
We have not had a real, manly man as president since the 80s!
Trump plays these political clowns like a fiddle! MAGA!
Glad to see Trump doing this, but he also needs to pop grassley and anyone talking of helping DACA or anything to help illegals when wall has not been built and laws are still being broken regarding immigration of all kinds.
Chuckie will look over the top of his glasses and point his finger at Trump and Trump will chuckle and pat him on the shoulder and say “yeah whatever”
As for San Fran Nan, she’ll just sit there and decompose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.