Why do you think this?
Same here. If the feds can today force states to adopt conceal
carry, they can tomorrow force to abandon. It is a dangerous precedent leaving no defensive measure, opening a flank.
Also it is poorly and weakly worded. 1. Frankly it is a constitutional right and more than a mere Civil right, but something of the order of defending from sedition against destructions of our rights, power balance and safety of the nation. This bill should reassert the constitutionality of the 2A, reminding historically how weapons were used to defend people helping free slaves and how the KKK restricted them in their states.
2. It reads like a weapon treaty assuming we are predators when this is about self defense and no treaty of limitted hunt should apply. There is no licence and knowledge of who is armed and not armed at the federal
level. It is recipe for divisive lists.