This is the guy who LED the Hillary investigation, changed the language of the unprecedented public admonition, signed off on the original "Russia Investigation" document, recommended the FISA warrants AND was removed for expressing extreme bias against POTUS.
He appears to be the nexus of the swamp coup conspiracy.
I know how to make him talk, though it would all be inadmissible.
Since Strzok’s not a lawyer, I wonder if Strzok made the changes on the recommendation of his lawyer mistress Lisa Page?
Its open season on her Heinous.
This is the ultimate scapegoat. They are piling everything on this guy and he will disappear. Typical Clinton actions. What about his sex toy girlfriend? Lisa Page was involved in the Anti-Trump texting and was moved off Mueller’s special group. That happened AFTER Strzok. Why is no one digging into her “bias”. I believe she still works for McCabe.
Strzok also interviewed General Flynn. He sounds like a reliable swamp creature.
the dems and CNN want the Clintons gone.
Let’s see if CNN discusses that Flynn’s interrogation was done by this same guy
He’s also reportedly the guy who looked over thousand of emails on Weiners laptop in record time.. and found nothing.
Indeed, its surprising CNN is talking about it at all.
Otherwise, we have found a Clinton mole. I wonder what else this corrupt FBI bureaucrat has been up during his time at the FBI?
He’s also the guy that told Comey “There’s no proof of intent”, which isn’t in the law.
Comey is going neener, neener to everyone who accused Comey of this alteration.
Cuz Comey is an a**.
Modified limited hangout...?
)(#*)$*!! this corrupt so-called “law enforcement” agency. When is the last time these political partisan hacks at the FBI solved a REAL crime?
Soldiers in the deep state war against the sovereign country and citizen.
()*#! them, and their careers. END THIS AGENCY.
I’m not a lawyer, but I have a few questions which some lawyer can hopefully answer for me.
Hillary should be under investigation for many of the crimes she committed in her long career.
But, since the uranium corrupt deal that Hillary was involved in, has heavy underlying premises for investigations to be occurring. So, why aren’t there FBI investigations underway as we speak. There is no doubt of the crimes and the pay-to-play that occurred for that deal to become a done deal. So, why not investigations from congress and the FBI?
Going along with the need for underlying premise that’s accompanies by REAL evidence... why are there any investigations underway regarding the allegations that Trump colluded with Russians during the campaign?
The underlying premise was FABRICATED, therefore, any investigations that occurred or are still occurring, should be declared invalid and unlawful and would/should be thrown out of any court.
It’s like a regular person getting accused of raping a woman, and then it’s discovered that the allegation was completely made up. Would that accused person still have to be investigated? After all, no rape occurred. Likewise, no Trump collusion occurred, since the investigations were triggered by a fabricated dossier. Fake charges for the “accused rapist”, and fake collusion charges for Trump.
It would seem logical that if an accused rapist does not get investigated for fabricated charges, then, Trump nor his associates, should be undergoing investigations for fake collusion charges.
There is evidence on the crooked uranium deal. There is no evidence on the Trump/Russian collusion to “steal the elections”.
What am I missing?
Thanks for posting this. When CNN the home of fake news publishes this hit piece on the former FBI Agent, he and Mueller are in trouble.
Agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey’s description of Clinton to ‘extremely careless’ from “grossly negligent.
CNN ^ | December 4th, 2017 | By Laura Jarrett and Evan Perez
Posted on 12/4/2017, 2:01:07 PM by Mariner
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the source said.
The shift from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for “gross negligence.”
Could this be Collusion?
Will the Media even dare to use that word?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
This article at CNN and the one other reporting the FBI agents initial removal, make zero mention of his having an affair with Lisa Page - despite referencing Lisa Page! Willful omission.
Thanks for posting this. When CNN the home of fake news publishes this hit piece on the former FBI Agent, he and Mueller are in trouble.
Agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey’s description of Clinton to ‘extremely careless’ from “grossly negligent.
CNN ^ | December 4th, 2017 | By Laura Jarrett and Evan Perez
Posted on 12/4/2017, 2:01:07 PM by Mariner
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the source said.
The shift from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for “gross negligence.”
Is Peter Strzok a real name or a stage name for a porno flick