Posted on 12/04/2017 2:01:07 PM PST by Mariner
That’s it. This guy is being set up to patsy for his BFF Comey’s crimes.
maybe Trump will bankroll him because he’s broke, selling his house
Comey is going neener, neener to everyone who accused Comey of this alteration.
Cuz Comey is an a**.
Modified limited hangout...?
i know hes paying the legal fees of Hope Hicks etc...that are getting interviewed in the witch hunt...
)(#*)$*!! this corrupt so-called “law enforcement” agency. When is the last time these political partisan hacks at the FBI solved a REAL crime?
Soldiers in the deep state war against the sovereign country and citizen.
()*#! them, and their careers. END THIS AGENCY.
The same agent described a hurricane as “somewhat breezy” and a flood as “an increase in moisture”.
I’m not a lawyer, but I have a few questions which some lawyer can hopefully answer for me.
Hillary should be under investigation for many of the crimes she committed in her long career.
But, since the uranium corrupt deal that Hillary was involved in, has heavy underlying premises for investigations to be occurring. So, why aren’t there FBI investigations underway as we speak. There is no doubt of the crimes and the pay-to-play that occurred for that deal to become a done deal. So, why not investigations from congress and the FBI?
Going along with the need for underlying premise that’s accompanies by REAL evidence... why are there any investigations underway regarding the allegations that Trump colluded with Russians during the campaign?
The underlying premise was FABRICATED, therefore, any investigations that occurred or are still occurring, should be declared invalid and unlawful and would/should be thrown out of any court.
It’s like a regular person getting accused of raping a woman, and then it’s discovered that the allegation was completely made up. Would that accused person still have to be investigated? After all, no rape occurred. Likewise, no Trump collusion occurred, since the investigations were triggered by a fabricated dossier. Fake charges for the “accused rapist”, and fake collusion charges for Trump.
It would seem logical that if an accused rapist does not get investigated for fabricated charges, then, Trump nor his associates, should be undergoing investigations for fake collusion charges.
There is evidence on the crooked uranium deal. There is no evidence on the Trump/Russian collusion to “steal the elections”.
What am I missing?
Thanks for posting this. When CNN the home of fake news publishes this hit piece on the former FBI Agent, he and Mueller are in trouble.
Agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey’s description of Clinton to ‘extremely careless’ from “grossly negligent.
CNN ^ | December 4th, 2017 | By Laura Jarrett and Evan Perez
Posted on 12/4/2017, 2:01:07 PM by Mariner
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the source said.
The shift from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for “gross negligence.”
Could this be Collusion?
Will the Media even dare to use that word?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
This article at CNN and the one other reporting the FBI agents initial removal, make zero mention of his having an affair with Lisa Page - despite referencing Lisa Page! Willful omission.
Thanks for posting this. When CNN the home of fake news publishes this hit piece on the former FBI Agent, he and Mueller are in trouble.
Agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey’s description of Clinton to ‘extremely careless’ from “grossly negligent.
CNN ^ | December 4th, 2017 | By Laura Jarrett and Evan Perez
Posted on 12/4/2017, 2:01:07 PM by Mariner
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the source said.
The shift from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for “gross negligence.”
Great question, maybe someone can get your question to Flynn's and Trump's lawyers.
WOW....nice take.
The take was/is piasa’s.
Kudos to you for picking up on it...... and passing the word.
Strzok’s wife got promoted to asst director at the SEC in Oct 2016. Obama appointed her. She probably knew about the affair then.
Is Peter Strzok a real name or a stage name for a porno flick
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.