Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats accept second invitation to meet with Trump
Axios ^ | 12/4/17 | Erica Pandey

Posted on 12/04/2017 12:44:18 PM PST by DoodleDawg

Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are headed to the White House Thursday for a bipartisan meeting with Republican leaders and President Trump. They accepted Trump's second invitation to meet after declining the first on Nov. 28.

The backdrop: Schumer and Pelosi skipped the first meeting after Trump tweeted that he didn't "see a deal" with them and called them "weak on crime" and "weak on illegal immigration." Monday, they said, "We hope the President will go into this meeting with an open mind, rather than deciding that an agreement can't be reached beforehand."

Full statement 159 words

The full statement:

"We're glad the White House has reached out and asked for a second meeting. We hope the President will go into this meeting with an open mind, rather than deciding that an agreement can't be reached beforehand.

"We need to reach a budget agreement that equally boosts funds for our military and key priorities here at home including the opioid crisis, pension plans and rural infrastructure. We have to provide funding for community health centers and CHIP, as well as relief for the millions of Americans still reeling from natural disasters. And we must also come together on a bipartisan deal to pass the DREAM Act along with tough border security measures. There is a bipartisan path forward on all of these items.

"As negotiations with our Republican counterparts continue, we are hopeful the President will be open to an agreement to address the urgent needs of the American people and keep government open."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pelosi; schumer; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
We'll see if this one comes off or if people go into a snit again.
1 posted on 12/04/2017 12:44:18 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Dem’s are sensitive little beggar’s ain’t they?


2 posted on 12/04/2017 12:47:27 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Dem’s are sensitive little beggar’s ain’t they?

When there are political points to be made then thin skin runs on both sides of the aisle.

3 posted on 12/04/2017 12:48:56 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Wow—hard to believe that Chuck and Nancy wrote the part about DACA with tough border security. Wonder what their pollsters are telling them.


4 posted on 12/04/2017 12:49:43 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Bow Down Nancy and Chuckie !

Making America Great Again without you.

5 posted on 12/04/2017 12:51:07 PM PST by Newbomb Turk (Hey Newbomb, where is your bothers ElCamino ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Come on President Trump, say NO to DACA and ANY form of Amnesty or Special Status!


6 posted on 12/04/2017 12:53:06 PM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Wow—hard to believe that Chuck and Nancy wrote the part about DACA with tough border security.

They're just trying to refute Trump's claim on being soft on border security. Doesn't mean they actually mean it.

7 posted on 12/04/2017 12:54:21 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are the ones who had repeatedly signaled that they had no intention of conceding anything before meeting with Trump, that they were approaching without any concessions they were willing to make to resolve the standing dispute.

Democrats, almost always, would much rather have the issue, than to ever make any kind of resolution.


8 posted on 12/04/2017 12:54:45 PM PST by alloysteel (The rhetorical question, "How stupid can you be?" is just considered to be a challenge by some.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk
Bow Down Nancy and Chuckie !
Making America Great Again without you.

Bow down? LOL! The Republicans have a 46 seat majority in the House and a 2 seat majority in the Senate. If Ryan and McConnell could control their members then they wouldn't need to come crawling to Schumer and Pelosi for votes enough to pass the continuing funding measures.

9 posted on 12/04/2017 12:56:27 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
Come on President Trump, say NO to DACA and ANY form of Amnesty or Special Status!

If he would tweet that ahead of time then there wouldn't be any need for the meeting.

10 posted on 12/04/2017 12:57:38 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Their first refusal did not go over to good!!!


11 posted on 12/04/2017 12:57:49 PM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg; TigersEye

Pelosifer and Schmucky want to attach DACA to the interim spending bill, or else they will shut the government down!

I hope they do that, because they will be walking into a “YUGE” Trump trap.

Sometimes I cannot believe that the Congressional leaders of the liberal fascist Dem party are actually dumber than dirt.
Alinsky tactics are not going to win against our president.


12 posted on 12/04/2017 12:58:16 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama FAscism) http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Time for the Donald to piss em all off again so they refuse the meeting.


13 posted on 12/04/2017 12:58:20 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz
Time for the Donald to piss em all off again so they refuse the meeting.

He's got till Thursday.

14 posted on 12/04/2017 12:58:58 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
During the Eisenhower years, at the start of a new Congress, Ike would have Sam Rayburn, Charlie Halleck, Everett Dirksen and Lyndon Johnson over to the White House to discuss the agenda for the new Congress. Ike would tend bar, mixing the drinks. (Bourbon and branch water for Speaker Sam!)

Most of the deals would be made and the bargains cemented over drinks. When the players went back to the House and Senate, the votes were there because Sam, Charlie, Everett and Lyndon had the votes and party discipline still existed.

We may be headed for something similar.

15 posted on 12/04/2017 12:59:49 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

We don’t need Schumer or Pelosi. We will be fine. I love to see them whine, bitch and cry though.


16 posted on 12/04/2017 1:01:01 PM PST by Newbomb Turk (Hey Newbomb, where is your bothers ElCamino ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Pelosifer and Schmucky want to attach DACA to the interim spending bill, or else they will shut the government down!

They won't shut the government down. The Republicans have majorities in both houses of Congress. If Ryan and McConnell could keep their people in line they could pass the budget resolutions without a single Democrat. If this all blows up again and the government shuts down then the GOP owns it.

17 posted on 12/04/2017 1:01:33 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Publius
We may be headed for something similar.

Not hardly. The Democrats would rather see the country go down the tubes than work with Republicans, and the Republicans feel the same way about working with Democrats. There is no middle to be found over drinks, or anything else.

18 posted on 12/04/2017 1:03:49 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk
We don’t need Schumer or Pelosi. We will be fine. I love to see them whine, bitch and cry though.

If they didn't need Pelosi and Schumer then the wouldn't be having the meeting.

19 posted on 12/04/2017 1:04:56 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

>>...doesn’t mean they actually mean it

Of course they don’t. But usually they are proud of not even pretending, because pandering to the underclass and the invaders is a cornerstone strategy of their path to power. Divide and conquer.


20 posted on 12/04/2017 1:06:10 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson