Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/03/2017 3:05:35 PM PST by richardb72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: richardb72

Thank you!

2 posted on 12/03/2017 3:08:48 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~Francis is temporary. Hell is forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Looks like I’ll be saving some $$$, if this is accurate.


3 posted on 12/03/2017 3:15:18 PM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Thank you, I save $2770 or $2444.


4 posted on 12/03/2017 3:17:45 PM PST by Navy Patriot (America returns to the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

We lose $200-400.


6 posted on 12/03/2017 3:19:51 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

This calculator doesn’t have 401k or equivalent, fsa/hsa, employer payroll medical deductions and a number of other things.


7 posted on 12/03/2017 3:20:49 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Will need a new one next week LOL!
They’ll sweeten it slightly for individuals in conference IMO.


9 posted on 12/03/2017 3:23:40 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Pretty similar results to what I have seen in other calculators poster here on FR. I plan to retire early in the next year or two and have built our retirement so that I can throttle our income to what ever is most beneficial to us. Under obumbercare, I can get almost fully subsidized. Medical was the biggest unknown.

I expected to have an increase while I am still working and then benefit once retired. At my current $250k, we do not itemize because we do not owe any money to anybody and our property tax is low. I’ll save $6k to $7k. Then only about $1k after I retire. This is much better then I expected.


10 posted on 12/03/2017 3:27:11 PM PST by JoSixChip (Repeal and replace the gopE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Thanks for posting. Could be more money back in my pocket with both House and Senate plan. I’m single, and don’t itemize deductions...have only pension and social security. It would be nice, but won’t hold my breath waiting.


11 posted on 12/03/2017 3:27:26 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72
Senate rate cuts expire in 2025 unless exended

Learn something everyday.

12 posted on 12/03/2017 3:52:24 PM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Question:

If I run a micro business do I use Gross or AG for this calculator?


14 posted on 12/03/2017 3:55:29 PM PST by JPJones (Who is FOR tariffs? George Washington, Ronald Reagan and Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

I think this calculator is bogus because even when I started making up numbers and each time it said my savings were 0.


15 posted on 12/03/2017 3:57:55 PM PST by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

I lose over $2k with either version.


18 posted on 12/03/2017 4:07:56 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Why are there no calculators for C-Corps and S-Corps?

Like these don’t exist? Or just the lower-echelon ones don’t matter?


19 posted on 12/03/2017 4:09:20 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Conservatives should do daily affirmations: reading/repeating the 9th and 10th Amendments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Lose $448. I’ll take that as an incentive to blame the state & local Californicating Spendocrats.


21 posted on 12/03/2017 4:11:01 PM PST by rfp1234 (I have already previewed this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

I lose $448 in house plan and $262 in senate plan.


22 posted on 12/03/2017 4:11:37 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Louisiana resident with 1 kid.

Saving $2000 per their calculation.


23 posted on 12/03/2017 4:13:37 PM PST by Bogey78O (So far so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Well I hate to burst anyone’s bubble but their current tax on us is wrong wrong. It says we currently pay much less than we really do. That makes me suspect of the other calculations. But it says under the senate plan we will owe more. Why does that not surprise me. Knew we’d get screwed on this. We always do. Anyway I guess I’ll be sending a bigger check than the one I’ve been sending for years.
Thanks Republicans! And thanks Trump for signing it.....because he needs a win and will sign it. Not what I fricken voted for!!!!!


25 posted on 12/03/2017 4:37:17 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

Is this for the 2017 taxes? I mean the ones that I already paid out in 2017?


26 posted on 12/03/2017 4:57:30 PM PST by madison10 (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

$300 more or $1200 more (round numbers).
FGOPe.


27 posted on 12/03/2017 5:16:07 PM PST by barefoot_hiker (Any)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: richardb72

I’ve always hated this kind of article, which the U.S. Snooze and World Report specializes in. “What X means for YOU.”

As long as the income tax is “progressive,” all attempts to make it less destructive will necessarily “give” bigger tax cuts to “the rich.” That’s the demonic thing about the “progressive” tax—ESPECIALLY as it is now, where half the people pay NOTHING (directly). It not only hurts EVERYONE by choking economic activity, and steals vast amounts of money, and is discriminatory and inequitable, but it contains its own built-in defense against change: Anyone who tries to soften or improve it can be smeared as “giving away billions to the rich, while the poor get nothing.”

We need to repeal the 16th Amendment. In the meantime, the goal should always be to get rid of all rates higher than 20%. If people were smarter and less envious, more people would favor “tax cuts for the rich.”

These “calculators” encourage people to focus on ME, ME, ME, rather than economic growth, which benefits practically everyone.


28 posted on 12/03/2017 5:47:36 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/hj3e8cKZWiY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson