To: mdittmar
There is simply no excuse for an “88 year old lawmaker.”
9 posted on
11/28/2017 5:15:53 PM PST by
Walrus
(Those who work should eat better than those who don't)
To: Walrus
There is simply no excuse for an “88 year old lawmaker.” What about a ”28 year old lawmaker" who lived on Mammy & Daddy's dime until finishing law school, then getting elected to Congress on the Family Name?
12 posted on
11/28/2017 5:21:24 PM PST by
BwanaNdege
("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
To: Walrus
There is simply no excuse for an “88 year old lawmaker.”
>><<
That’s right. It’s wrong in so many ways. And those that stay beyond age 65-70 are not normal people. Any normal person would retire and try to enjoy their family and life for their remaining years.
15 posted on
11/28/2017 5:56:24 PM PST by
laplata
(Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson