[tinyowl]

It's interesting ... this is the second or 3rd time I've heard the dems defending things because they are 'icons' ... not on merit or facts or anything.

The climate priest yesterday talked about Time mag as an icon (Koch brothers buying it would of course destroy the icon.)

So I guess if something is an icon, regardless of what it's actually made of or does, it must not be messed with. This is not all that surprising since the dem leadership is 4000 years old.

Maybe 'relic' would be a better term than icon.

[goodnesswins]

Yes...I’m waiting for them to declare Goebbels an “icon”...or maybe I’m behind the times and they already have.