Skip to comments.
Warren goes off on Trump over CFPB defense
The Hill ^
| 11/25/2017
| Max Greenwood
Posted on 11/26/2017 2:46:38 AM PST by advance_copy
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) savaged President Trump on Saturday for his claim that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has crippled financial institutions, claiming that the president would destroy the watchdog agency.
In a series of tweets Saturday night, Warren defended CFPB's work, saying that the agency had forced financial institutions to return ill-gotten money to those they wronged and accusing Trump of taking up for powerful banks.
[SNIP]
Hours later, Trump tapped White House budget chief Mick Mulvaney as the agency's acting director, setting up a showdown at the CFPB. Mulvaney, a conservative former congressman, has been a vocal critic of the CFPB, once calling the agency "a sick, sad joke.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: cfpb; elizabethwarren; massachusetts; mulvaney; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
It's an excellent decision by President Trump! Mick Mulvaney is one of the smartest people serving in government today. Of course, Mr. Trump is one of the smartest Presidents ever.
And then there's this,
Justice Dept says Trump has authority to appoint CFPB acting director, which he does.
Too bad for Senator Warren. Elections do have consequences, ya know.
To: advance_copy
"claiming that the president would destroy the watchdog agency"That is the point, sweety.
The "watch" of a watchdog agency is supposed to prevent fraud, illegality and unconstitutional decisions.
But a "watch" of a watchdog agency that spies and uses that information to the destruction of free enterprise is NOT the watchdog agency we Americans want.
Your President is the best you've ever had and quite probably the best you'll EVER see in your lifetime.
Deal with it.
2
posted on
11/26/2017 2:55:20 AM PST
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true)
To: advance_copy
claiming that the president would destroy the watchdog agency.
Be still be heart.
L
3
posted on
11/26/2017 3:02:13 AM PST
by
Lurker
(President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
To: advance_copy
The watchdog agency was established by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act, which sought to overhaul U.S. financial regulations in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.Drama erupted at the agency on Friday after now-former CFPB Director Richard Cordray named chief of staff Leandra English to the deputy director position just before stepping down from atop the CFPB. The Dodd-Frank act states that in the absence of a permanent director, the deputy director will helm the agency.
Answering a question that popped up on an earlier thread. There is a conflict between the Dodd-Frank Act and the standard rules for appointing a new director.
So far, no final decision but the stage has been set for yet another lawsuit to bog down Trump's reforms. The Justice Dept has greenlighted Trump's appointment of Mulvaney over a promotion for convenience of Ms. English.
4
posted on
11/26/2017 3:06:51 AM PST
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: knarf
The CFPB is on borrowed time. The Washington DC Court of Appeals has already decided that its unaccountable structure does not pass constitutional muster. It overlaps multiple other agencies regulations, and created regulations that were the opposite of other agencies rules.
Cordray bailed to protect his new federal pension, knowing that he couldn't justify any of his actions to his new boss.
5
posted on
11/26/2017 3:15:08 AM PST
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: texas booster
There is a conflict between the Dodd-Frank Act and the standard rules for appointing a new director.
No conflict at all, Dodd-Frank does not specify what happens when there is a vacancy. Accordingly, the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 applies, which gives the President authority to appoint acting Director. Any lawsuit to the contrary would be dispatched easily.
6
posted on
11/26/2017 3:18:13 AM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life or nothing at all)
To: advance_copy
Well,
The Hill managed to get a comment from Barney Frank (D-Male Prostitution Rings) about the CFPB:
Former Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who co-authored the 2010 law that established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), blasted the White House's claim that President Trump has the authority to install an interim director at the watchdog agency.
In an interview with CNN on Saturday, Frank said that the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act specifically states that the CFPB’s deputy director will head the agency in the absence of a permanent director a move he said is intended to protect the agency's independence.
“We gave a lot of attention to how to structure the CFPB and how to protect its independence, because its job is to go after some very powerful forces in the economy,” he told CNN.
“The point is, we intend what [former CFPB Director Richard] Cordray was doing to have this kind of autonomy.”
Yep, just another Democrat protecting other unindicted co-conspirators.
7
posted on
11/26/2017 3:22:55 AM PST
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: advance_copy
8
posted on
11/26/2017 3:25:03 AM PST
by
Qiviut
(Obama's Legacy in two words: DONALD TRUMP)
To: advance_copy
I think the Demoncrats are arguing the difference between “appointed” and “permanent” director.
I agree with you - the Boss gets to appoint new leadership in the event of a vacancy. Otherwise, there would be total chaos every time the administration changed hands.
9
posted on
11/26/2017 3:25:43 AM PST
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: advance_copy
I guess “Warren goes on the warpath over CFPB defense” would be insensitive to her heritage.
10
posted on
11/26/2017 3:29:10 AM PST
by
McGruff
(Lock Her Up! In a Padded Cell!)
To: Qiviut
"...$55 million that has been set aside for renovating the CFPB headquarters building just steps from the White House. Incidentally, $55 million is more than the entire annual construction and acquisition budget for GSA for the totality of federal buildings, McHenry added, referencing the General Services Administration.
Unreal. We should note that this is a government bureau that does not have any special security requirements, or any weapons, or any special equipment. Con artists!
11
posted on
11/26/2017 3:30:33 AM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life or nothing at all)
To: Lurker
Upset because she wont have an “IN” at the CFPB. Ah the leader of the down trodden, defender of the small people
12
posted on
11/26/2017 3:30:45 AM PST
by
ronnie raygun
(Trump plays chess the rest are still playing checkers)
To: advance_copy
13
posted on
11/26/2017 3:31:09 AM PST
by
McGruff
(Lock Her Up! In a Padded Cell!)
To: advance_copy
I'm just curious: When Warren said she was sexually harassed years ago by some co-worker who chased her around a desk, did she run around the desk like this?....
14
posted on
11/26/2017 3:46:10 AM PST
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan from taking office.)
To: advance_copy
15
posted on
11/26/2017 4:07:37 AM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: texas booster
The watchdog agency was established by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act, which sought to overhaul U.S. financial regulations in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
Remember when the CFPB sent all those bankers to jail for their illegal dealings during the financial crisis? Neither do I.
16
posted on
11/26/2017 4:11:42 AM PST
by
Flick Lives
(The FBI is a taxpayer funded Mafia organization)
To: advance_copy
Anything that upsets swamp dweller Warren has to be good for me.
17
posted on
11/26/2017 4:25:05 AM PST
by
Kudsman
( Anyone to the Right of Stalin is a Far Right Wing candidate to the Far Left Wing Media.)
To: McGruff
18
posted on
11/26/2017 4:38:21 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: advance_copy
Yet another government agency that adds to the swamp. Time to drain this one!
JoMa
19
posted on
11/26/2017 4:48:13 AM PST
by
joma89
To: advance_copy
I did question how crippled the financial institutions have been. They were getting paid to take money and bailed out. By trillions of our dollars.. they we bred with insurance companies to make even more trillions by administering medicare, to the tune of how much?
Tell me how they suffer, cause I can’t see it myself.
20
posted on
11/26/2017 4:49:57 AM PST
by
momincombatboots
(White Stetsons up.. let's save our country!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson