Realistically, there is no correlation between what (I believe) Moore did as a much-younger man and what these character witnesses are saying. It sounds like Moore is a very upstanding man now, but that does not mean he is innocent of what numerous people allegedly witnessed decades ago.
You mean numerous Dem hacks who were paid by the WaPo.
False accusation.
Slander.
Go hide under you rock.
It sounds like Moore is a very upstanding man now, but that does not mean he is innocent of what numerous people allegedly witnessed decades ago.
RTFA!
Some of those character references cover the time frame in question and more.
In any case, you have the burden of proof wrong.
And you ignore common sense suspicions such as the timing of the accusations and their source.
Many people are claiming they have known him for decades and never witnessed any of the behavior that is being alleged. The statements are directly refuting the allegations claiming knowledge of his demeanor/behavior at the time the allegations are said to have occurred.
“that does not mean he is innocent of what numerous people allegedly witnessed decades ago.”
Even if so, and they are all telling the truth (which I find highly unlikely), exactly what did he do? Nothing illegal. And something very common to human history. Men in their twenties married women in their teens all the time for most of human history. I may not like it (I have teenage daughters) but you know -
Almanzo Wilder courted and married Laura Ingalls. No one seemed bothered about it.