He “would have” made a better AG? He still would. I wonder if PDJT has done any succession planning in the event Sessions has to go.
“He “would have” made a better AG? He still would. I wonder if PDJT has done any succession planning in the event Sessions has to go.”
The problem with naming an AG is that you want a Sheriff of Nottingham in the spot, but he/she has to look squeaky clean going through the nomination process. Then again, if a Democrat nominates one, the person just has to assure the opposition that he/she won’t open any investigations on them.
You want a Guiliani or a Christie in there, but Rudy is too old and Crispy is too tainted with Bridgegate. But then again, isn’t Bannon a lawyer?