Are you serious? I see the way Holder operated as politicization. I see Sessions as professional. I happen to believe they are working behind the scenes the way they should. I don’t think prosecutors should build their cases in front of cameras. I don’t think prosecutors should telegraph their every move. I think prosecutors should quietly investigate and bring charges once their case has been prepared.
We don’t disagree over the goal, we disagree over the process. I readily admit I have no idea what Sessions is really doing, but I think that is how it should be. If Hillary isn’t indicted before the end of DJT’s term, then I’ll agree with you.
I once investigated an ingenious auto parts scheme that allowed for the gradual theft of millions from auto dealers all over the country. Because it was gradual and because computers weren’t what they are today, it went on for years undetected. My office spent more time on that case than Sessions has been in office. The man just hasn’t been given enough time to draw such dire conclusions. That’s all I’m saying.
“I readily admit I have no idea what Sessions is really doing”
You got that right.
When you say "they" exactly who are you talking about?
Because I can tell you after watching several of the testimonies that Sessions gave to Congress live, it is fairly obvious he is not personally involved in any investigations, of anything. He doesn't answer questions not because he doesn't feel he should, he doesn't answer questions because in most cases because he doesn't even know! He's nothing but a figurehead who is out there doing damage control for his beleaguered department.
And his department, the DoJ, is beleaguered for a reason, many reasons in fact. Yet this the "they" you want us to trust?