Posted on 11/17/2017 3:57:07 PM PST by Kaslin
RUSH: I got in today and my email was blowing up with people, “You gotta see it. You’ve gotta see it. Oh, my God, it’s the best. It’s the greatest ever. And it’s about time.”
I said, “What’s this?” So I read what this is about, and apparently Senator Orrin Hatch let Senator what’s-his-name, Sherrod Brown of Ohio have it for demagoguing tax cuts. I haven’t heard it. I’ve only read it, and I’ve had people say, “I’m sure it will be in your sound bite roster, and if it isn’t, you’ve got to make sure it’s there. It’s just so long overdue.”
So my expectations have been raised pretty high. I’m expecting to hear something that I haven’t heard in a long time. I’m expecting my reaction to say, “Way to go, Orrin, all right.” So let’s listen and see if that’s what — have you seen this, Mr. Snerdley? All right. Here’s the setup. It was yesterday on Capitol Hill. Senate Finance Committee debating the Senate tax reform bill. And it begins with Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown.
BROWN: I just think it would be nice just tonight, before we go home, to just acknowledge, “Well, this tax cut really is not for the middle class. It’s for the rich.” And that whole thing about higher wages, well, it’s a good selling point. But we know companies don’t just give away higher wages. They just don’t give away higher wages just ’cause they have more money. Corporations are sitting on a lot of money now. They’re sitting on a lot of profits now. I don’t see wages going up. So just spare us the bank shots.
RUSH: All right. So we have the typical cliched Democrat criticism that any tax cut is a sop to the rich and that corporations don’t give away profits and they’re sitting out there and they’re sitting on all kinds of money and they’re not giving the money away and they’re not paying people, so this is just a tax cut for the rich. Here, now, Senator Orrin Hatch reacting to Senator Brown.
HATCH: I’ve been here working my whole stinking career for people who don’t have a chance. And I really resent anybody saying that I’m just doing this for the rich. Give me a break. I think you guys overplay that all the time, and it gets old. And, frankly, you ought to quit it.
BROWN: Mr. Chair, the public…
HATCH: (crosstalk) I’m not through. I get kind of sick and tired of it. True, it’s a nice political play.
BROWN: Well, Mr. Chairman…
HATCH: But it’s not true.
RUSH: Well, I have to say it is unusual. I do have to agree that this is unusual for elected Republicans to be reacting to Democrat lies and demagoguery in this way. Sherrod Brown, Sherrod Brown, however he pronounces it. Is it Sherrod or Sherrod? Does anybody know? Does anybody care? All right. Okay, so Sherrod, Sherrod Brown then retorted.
BROWN: With all due respect, I get sick and tired of the richest…
GRASSLEY: Regular order, Mr. Chairman.
BROWN: …getting richer and…
GRASSLEY: Regular order.
HATCH: Listen I’ve honored you by allowing to you start off here and what you said was not right. That’s all I’m saying. I come from the lower middle class originally. We didn’t have anything. So don’t spew that stuff on me. I get a little tired of that crap. And let me just say something. If we worked together we could pull this country out of every mess it’s in, but I’m telling you, this bull crap that you guys throw out here really gets old after a while.
Senators get into shouting match over new Republican tax plan
RUSH: I have to applaud it. I have to applaud it. Bull crap, this stuff you guys been throughout out, absolutely right. And we don’t hear elected Republicans reacting this way to elected Democrats who lie and demagogue. Every time a tax cut bill comes along they lie about it and demagogue it. So kudos to Senator Hatch for actually deciding not just to sit there listen and chalk it up, “Well, that’s just the Democrats being Democrats.”
I saw this right before the program started, too, and sadly I don’t remember who — I think it was Steve Mnuchin, actually, who was — what is he, Treasury secretary, Mnuchin and the Trump administration talking about his tax cut bill and he’s talking to some media person and he’s explaining — we may even have the sound bite of this — yeah, here it is. Grab 16 and 17.
This just ticks me off too. This is the same stuff. And this is a Trump administration official articulating this, and it needs to be shut down. Steve Mnuchin is on Fox this morning with Bill Hemmer and they’re talking about tax reform and Hemmer says, “You will admit now for the sake of this discussion that some Americans will be paying more in taxes, right? You have to admit that.”
MNUCHIN: There will be people who make more than a million dollars in high-tax states that will be paying more. And as the president has said, this is not a tax plan to cut taxes for rich people. This is a tax plan to make businesses competitive and give middle income taxpayers —
HEMMER: When I hear that M-word I think it’s code, you know, and I’m used to hearing it from the left for many years. I think you are as well. I think you would admit that. But this is a Republican majority in the House and in the Senate and in the White House. And you’re admitting that for some Americans, they will pay more in taxes. Is this what the American people have waited a generation for?
RUSH: Plaudits to Bill Hemmer. When is it that the Republicans happily describe raising taxes for people? Now, look, I know this is Trump’s deal. But they’re falling back on this too easily. Paul Ryan’s falling, every time I’ve talked to him about it, about the rate, 39.6 not being cut, “Well, well, you gotta take it up with the president. He’s insisting on this. He doesn’t think guys like him deserve a tax cut.” So here comes Mnuchin saying the same thing. “Yeah, people who make a million, we’re gonna raise their rate.”
Republicans don’t make a big deal out of raising people’s taxes, but these guys aren’t Republicans in this sense; they’re populists. And they’re simply saying what they think a majority of you want to hear. Trump believes that most of his voters want the rich to have more pain. Or put another way, Trump believes that most of you, his voters, do not want the rich to get any tax relief, while everybody else does. And that’s so far away from the Republican signature belief on taxes, this soak-the-rich business.
Why do we have to join that fray when the Democrats live and breathe to do it? Besides which, those are the people already paying the vast majority of all taxes anyway, and you don’t have to get to a million dollars to include most people. Are you ready for this? The top 10% is paying 95% of all taxes now, and yet we still have to listen to this garbage, first from Sherrod Brown about the rich are getting a break and then the Trump regime comes along, “No, they’re not getting a break, we’re soaking ’em.”
And then we have to listen to the old saw, “Well, we gotta raise taxes on the rich because we have to pay for it.” No we don’t have to pay. Why can’t Washington get a little smaller just once, just a couple hundred billion dollars, why can’t Washington ever shrink? So after Hemmer said, “You’re admitting that some Americans are gonna pay more in taxes, is this what the American people have waited a generation for?” Here’s Mnuchin.
Mnuchin: Republicans Are Raising Taxes on 'Rich People in High-Tax States'
MNUCHIN: Just to be clear, what we’re doing is getting rid of the state and local tax deduction, which is a loophole for high-tax states. That’s the reason why New York, California, and others have taxes as high as they are because the federal government is subsidizing those taxes. And for most Americans, the vast number of Americans that don’t have high-tax states, it’s not fair that they’re subsidizing a few states. So, again, the people’s taxes who are gonna go up are the rich people in high-tax states.
RUSH: Yeah. Okay. And I understand that he’s talking about the end of deductibility for state and local taxes and so forth. But see, that’s not all that’s happening here. In addition to that happening, after you reach a certain income threshold, you’re not getting a rate cut. There are two different tax increases happening here while everybody else is getting a tax cut.
Now, I’m fine with eliminating the state and local taxes deduction. You know, that’s fine. That works out for me. I’ll talking about philosophically, I understand it works out for me, but this business that we have to pay for this somehow, I can’t tell you how that grates on me. What do you mean we have to pay for it? It’s like said the other day, if you have a tax cut, let’s say Washington starts out with $3 trillion to work with, that’s what they collect every year, just making up a number. It’s fairly close, three trillion.
And then come along and they tout a major, major tax cut. And the tax cut means that you are gonna keep more in your pocket, you’re gonna pay less. So Washington’s gonna have less than three trillion. No, they’re not. Washington’s not. They’re gonna find a way to make up the difference. So if after all of this is over they still have three trillion then what the hell tax cut has there been? Part and parcel of a tax cut is the shrinking of government.
In this case it is a zero-sum game, but not totally because Washington will end up with more revenue if the rate reduction on everybody is implemented, which causes economic growth, which then causes more taxpayers to be hired, more jobs be created, and they create more revenue in Washington. It’s how it works and it does work.
Here, grab sound bite number 15, Larry Summers. This is the guy that used to run Harvard. He got thrown out of there for saying the reason there aren’t that many women professors in math is that they just don’t get it. Remember that? He was the president at Harvard. He’s been in the economic adviser council for Bill Clinton back in the Clinton sexual harassment days. Oh, and there’s more on that today and of course more on the Franken stuff, but I need to get this and one other thing off my chest before we get into that. Here’s Larry Summers. This is on CNN today with Jamie Gangel. She said, “What do you think about Senate Republicans trying to repeal the Obamacare mandate?”
SUMMERS: Jamie, this is madness. It is madness to spend $300 billion taking health insurance away from more than 10 million Americans in order to finance tax cuts for the top 1% of Americans.
RUSH: Stop the tape. Mr. Summers, you don’t know math yourself. You had no business being the president of Harvard. There is no tax cut for the top 1%. That’s the point. They are not whatever you said here, taking health insurance away from more than 10 million Americans to finance tax cuts for the top 1%. There aren’t any. There are not any tax cuts for the top 1%. Maybe a portion of the top 1%, but it’s gonna be minuscule if it exists. There is no rate reduction for them.
Dr. Summers, the subsidies to the insurance companies were illegal, they were unconstitutional. The Obamacare mandate, ditto. Not gonna fix any of this. But you note the language here (imitating Summers), “Why, we can’t do this. How are we gonna pay for this? You can’t help eliminate health insurance for needy Americans to pay for a tax cut –” None of that happening. Not a single shred of that is happening. Well, this is how it all gets demagogued so it’s a good thing that Orrin Hatch called Sherrod Brown out on it.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
Stunning that Mr Rino Hatch lit off on Brown
we have had a belly full of divide an conquer politics
Currently they are trying to pit man against woman while they teach 5 year old kids about gender fluidity.
call BS!
Some times I wish our congress and Senate would come to fisticuffs instead of the mamby pamby, “I yield to the speaker” BS
Hatch was great on this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
