[Enlightened1]

The BURDEN OF PROOF is on the accusers.

Anyone notice how the media ignores the glaring timing of these charges? They came right after the Republican primary a few months ago.

Moore has over the past 30 years ran about 6 campaigns and was a public figure all that time. Why didn’t these women come out during the primaries? After all, they claim they voted for President Trump who supported Moore’s Republican opponent.

One thing missing from all of these charges are husbands, mothers fathers siblings of these women in which none have gone on record saying they were told years ago what had happened.

What about that yearbook signature? Moore could have been eating in the restaurant and the waitress struck up a friendly conversation and asked him to sign her yearbook. A set up in other words.

One guy, an admitted Democrat, came forward & said Moore was banned from the mall but police have no record of that & it would have come out in any one of his 5 campaigns.

One of Moore’s accuser’s worked for the Hillary campaign.

Sorry Hannity innocent until proven guilty.

[sagar]

The statute of limitations would have expired anyway. Somebody signed an autograph 40 years ago? Boo freaking hoo. But fake news, so everything’s moot.

[Jamestown1630]

The BURDEN OF PROOF is on the accusers...Sorry Hannity innocent until proven guilty.

Exactly how I feel about it. I don’t know if the man is innocent or guilty – though the timing of these accusations is very suspicious.

I want presumption of innocence and due process, before Moore is judged. It’s a matter of ‘rule of law’, as opposed to mere allegations being used to destroy a man - and if we let this kind of 'mob rule' go on, anyone could become a victim, for any reason.