Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: davikkm

Innocent until proven guilty.

Wow, not even Congress is paying attention to that anymore.

We REALLY need Judge Moore in the Senate now!


2 posted on 11/14/2017 9:03:56 AM PST by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: davikkm

We REALLY need Judge Moore in the Senate now!


Yep. This is looking like a fight to the death - literally - for the uniparty.


5 posted on 11/14/2017 9:05:44 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2003/09/30/not_nature_of_evidence_seriousness_of_the_charge/


21 posted on 11/14/2017 9:10:48 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
Innocent until proven guilty

Yup. Anyone who has no reason to doubt the women should also have no reason to doubt Roy Moore. These stories certainly deserve a large dose of skepticism. Keep in mind the puppet masters pulled the same level sewage to save Cochran's Senate seat. Consider the shenanigans to save Lisa Murkowski after she lost the primary to a conservative.

I hope the Judge has some real excellent evidence about the deceit behind these accusations.

62 posted on 11/14/2017 9:37:47 AM PST by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

He has no legal basis to disbelieve either Roy Moore or the accusers at this point. My opinion is that the accusers are lying, but I have no legal basis for that opinion. The timing, handwriting analysis, etc., help from my opinion, but it hasn’t been investigated.


116 posted on 11/14/2017 10:34:20 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

....this isn’t looking very good for the Judge regardless of which side any are on. For whatever reasons he’s yet to speak strong enough against the accusations.....and the political heat is getting hotter.

They can get the Judge out just by ‘creating doubt’...which currently they’re fast being successful at.


119 posted on 11/14/2017 10:43:02 AM PST by caww (freeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
Jeff Sessions: I Have No Reason to Believe Judge Moore Accusers are Lying

Hey Jeff!

Do you have any EVIDENCE that's says that MOORE is lying?

122 posted on 11/14/2017 10:49:31 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

In a court of law, yes. In the court of public opinion, however, it’s only fair to give the accused the benefit of a doubt until all the facts are in. But that’s if you want to be fair.

It costs the accusers nothing to make the accusation, and they will be famous and maybe even rich just for targeting Moore. Judge Moore, however, will have his reputation ruined for ever if they are automatically believed, and lose the election into the bargain. It’s profoundly unfair to put the onus on him to prove they are lying. Instead, they should have to prove that they are telling the truth.


134 posted on 11/14/2017 11:06:40 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson