Andrew Goebbels?................any relation?...............
Please tell us ,even better make a video and put it on Youtube , thumb up or down will decide ,LOL
Lots of fun at another witch-doctor re-union!
“Andrew Goebbels, a climate extremes research fellow...”
Can’t make this up.
Gibberish..................
Whatever they say after all the tampering of data, the inconsistency in the statistics, and just weakness in the fundamental hypothesis, is absolutely worthless.
In the end, year after year of just walking outside everyday proves that nothing is amiss.
This isn’t a scientific study.
This is a result that a paper was written to validate.
Does it even take into account the increased frequency of observations, changed instrumentation, potential of natural variability?
I doesn’t seem so, from the way the study is worded.
For example, how did the differentiate between manmade climate change and natural climate change?
This is hilarious. There ‘SHOULD’ have been only seven hot years? Based on what?
And the lead scientist’s name is Goebbels? You can’t make this up.
Also, we were measuring global temperatures in 1861? How can any logical person believe this stuff.
They always seem to use a start date for their data at the end of the Little Ice Age. We do have records that go back much earlier than that.
If one is looking for record high global temperatures, it helps a lot if you get your ocean-related data from thermometers on boiler intake pipes of commercial ships instead of just the weather buoys that were designed for that task.
The same Scientists that said we’ll run out of Oil decades ago
More TOTAL BS from the Left!!!!
Scientists claim DEFINITIVE PROOF that global warming is man-made and getting WORSE
________________________________________
Well that’s it then. When the news is reported IN ALL CAPS, Well what else is there to say?
It must be true.
/SARC
I guess “proof,” is not what it used to be.
“Andrew Goebbels”
Makes sense.
5.56mm
All bogus until they stop using adjusted data. It is not scientifically valid to adjust the data then say the data supports a conclusion. That data has been adjusted to support the conclusion.
Non-adjusted data records show no warming and that the hottest period was in the 1930’s long before man made influences could have been involved.
Without human-caused climate change, there should only have been an average of seven record hot years from 1861 to 2005, not 17.
Now why did they leave out the Medieval Warming Period when the Vikings colonized and FARMED GREENLAND, currently under ICE!!!
The Proof is always Top Secret and they never tell you