.
It was proven beyond a shadow of doubt that the yearbook was a fraud. It took only one day to do so, because the fraud was so obvious that anyone actually looking at could see it was faked.
When dealing with a man of Moore’s proven stature, his word has to be taken as gold. That is the way it is with an honorable man.
Senators in general kike to be called “Honorable,” but most have proven the contrary, including McConnell and Graham.
Fine. It all has to be aired in public. Carefully-worded allegations made by a woman’s lawyer about alleged incidents from 40 years ago is not a public airing. Put the woman on the stand and have direct and cross-examination, about the car, the yearbook, everything. Produce samples of Moore’s signature and compare them. They want a public airing, give it to them. Right before the election, with whatever discovery can be had, a moot court trial.
Nobody’s word should be taken as gold. Gold has to be tested before it’s proven gold. But if it is gold, it’ll withstand the test.
What disturbs me most about the Moore case is that the lawyer’s statements are taken as true simply because she claims to have a client who told her to make those statements.