Am I to believe that the cops, fully aware that their every move is recorded by SEVERAL cameras, openly and deliberately “planted” drugs on an arrested suspect for every one to see? Or, am I to believe that the suspect’s attorney is interjecting his own version of the video to “cast doubt” on the guilt of his client which would set him free?
> Am I to believe that the cops, fully aware that their every move is recorded by SEVERAL cameras, openly and deliberately “planted” drugs on an arrested suspect for every one to see? <
Good question, and I wondered the same thing. So I checked around a bit. As I noted in post #19, evidently an LAPD officer can choose when to activate his body cam. And when activated, both video and audio are recorded.
The audio starts after the drugs have been planted (if they really were). But the video starts 30 seconds before that, without any audio. That video shows possible planting of evidence.
From what I read, when an LAPD officer activates his body cam, the camera automatically saves the last 30 seconds that were automatically recorded before the activation. The cop didn’t know, or forgot, that.
But like all recent news, there is certainly more to the story. Time will tell.