Posted on 11/10/2017 1:21:10 PM PST by davikkm
Brazile is not really doing this (crapping on Hillary) for herself to run. She's an operative. Yeah, she's selling some books but this is backed by someone in the shadows who wants to run themselves or open the way for someone else to run.
But that someone needs the old guard, Hillary, out of the way. Pelosi is such a doddering idiot right now, she'll take care of herself. But Hillary needs to get off the stage and this is their attempt to do so.
Clear the deck. Get rid of the riff raff. Set the table for someone else to have a run at it.
Sen. Kamala Harris of California could be Brazile's candidate, but my money would be on Michele too, since the the Clintons and Obamas hate each other. Michelle winning the first woman president trophy would just fry Hillary's ass.
Michelle Obama in 2020 is laughable to many of us but then so was Donald Trump to the other side. Stranger things have happened in politics.
So statistically speaking, six separate caucus coin tosses could come up all “heads” just as easily as coming up any other combination.
Clever. Now let’s talk probability.
For each toss of a coin, correctly predicting the result has a probability of 0.5. Correctly predicting three times has a probability of .125 (.5x.5x.5).
The chance of guessing correctly six times in a row is 0.0156.
So each toss of a coin has a ½ chance of being predicted, but six correct predictions in a row is unlikely.
So THAT is why she wrote the book. “I’m telling the truth to save the party, kick out Clinton and Pelosi, let me take over!”
A recent article in the San Francisco Examiner reported that Nancy Pelosi has sued Stanford Hospital, saying that “after her husband hadsurgery there, he lost all interest in sex”.
A hospital spokesman replied: Your husband was admitted for cataract surgery. All we did was correct his eyesight.
I think Donna is pushiing to get hired by Fox News.
You're quite right, of course.
My comment was that each possible outcome has an equal probability. Your comment was that any particular outcome has a 1/2^n probability. Which observation one chooses to deal with depends on what one is talking about.
In this case it's the probability of the particular outcome, so your comment is the more relevant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.