She wasn’t grossly negligent.
She practiced deliberate evasion and deception.
That she instructed Huma Abedin to remove all email classifications is a clear indication of that.
How she has not been prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced is beyond me.
That she has not been prosecuted has nothing to do with the merits of the case. What always and forevermore will override all is the fact the Clintons are above the laws that govern the rest of us.
“She wasn’t grossly negligent. She practiced deliberate evasion and deception.”
Exactly. It was all intentional. All of it, back to Rose Law.
Right on.
They’re trying to dismiss this as “an early draft”. Really? What facts changed this opinion? How is “extremely careless” different from “grossly negligent” anyway? I want a precise explanation. It stinks.
That said, you’re right, this wasn’t able being ignorant or careless. It was a direct and deliberate act to not comply with the law and then cover up the activity.
All you have to do is read the Espionage Act - it’s pretty clear and easy to understand. All you have to do is mishandle sensitive information, even by accident, and you’re in violation. What she did was deliberately criminal.