Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

From the document:

Key Finding 1

The likely range of the human contribution to the global mean temperature increase over the period 1951–2010 is 1.1° to 1.4°F (0.6° to 0.8°C), and the central estimate of the observed warming of 1.2°F (0.65°C) lies within this range (high confidence). This translates to a likely human contribution of 93%–123% of the observed 1951–2010 change. It is extremely likely that more than half of the global mean temperature increase since 1951 was caused by human influence on climate (high confidence). The likely contributions of natural forcing and internal variability to global temperature change over that period are minor (high confidence).


10 posted on 11/04/2017 7:06:26 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

“This translates to a likely human contribution of 93%–123% of the observed 1951–2010 change.”

From 1951 to 1976: Cooling.
From 1977 to 1998: Warming
From 1998 to 2010: No Warming.

How these idiot scientists can conclude anything from that data is absurd.


15 posted on 11/04/2017 7:27:32 AM PDT by JPJones (Who is FOR tariffs? George Washington, Ronald Reagan and Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson