Agree. It is generally regarded that assassinating him was a ham-handed mistake at best and a disaster at worst, but I don’t think it would have changed history either way, although my opinion is that ultimately he would have probably been more helpful than not.
“Agree. It is generally regarded that assassinating him was a ham-handed mistake at best and a disaster at worst, but I don’t think it would have changed history either way, although my opinion is that ultimately he would have probably been more helpful than not.”
The favor was returned in spades Nov. 22, 1963.
I’ve always felt that JFK’s assassination was an act of just retribution for the cavalier attitude he had about toppling and assassinating foreign leaders.