Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Paving Way to Abandon Nuclear Deal, Fortify Missile Program
Washington Free Beacon ^ | October 25, 2017 | Adam Kredo

Posted on 10/26/2017 10:58:21 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo

Iran has taken steps in recent days to file what it claims are 18 instances in which America violated the landmark nuclear agreement, a move that could set the stage for Tehran to abandon the deal and lay blame on the Trump administration, according to regional reports and sources familiar with the matter.

On the heels of an effort by the Trump administration to tighten the nuclear accord while still upholding U.S. commitments under it, the Iranian Foreign Ministry has submitted to European Union leaders a plethora of information recounting what it claims are 18 separate violations of the deal by the United States, according to Iran's state-controlled media.

The latest move is said to be part of an effort by Iran to abandon the nuclear agreement and save face by blaming the United States for its decision, according to national security insiders closely tracking the situation.

As the Trump administration makes moves to sanction Iran for its ballistic missile program and regional support of terrorism, Iran is increasingly frustrated with the United States' aggressive stance, which is being spearheaded by President Donald Trump and his congressional allies.

Iran's foreign ministry submitted a report to the country's Parliament outlining what it claims are at least 18 instances of the United States violating the agreement. The accusations come just days after Trump decertified Iranian compliance with the nuclear deal.

"The recent report is specifically about the Americans' efforts to derail the JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action], so much so that the foreign ministry has delineated 18 blatant cases of breach of the agreement made by U.S.," Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, an Iranian member of parliament, told the country's state-controlled media organs on Tuesday.

Iran's foreign ministry is said to have forwarded this information to Federica Mogherini, the EU's high representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, one of the international organizations monitoring compliance with the agreement.

"The foreign ministry has forwarded ten letters to Ms. Mogherini in this regard, and the base of the report is on the continuation of sanction-era situation in areas of maritime transportation, oil and gas export, and the return of the revenues," according to Falahatpisheh.

While the Trump administration has withheld from commenting on Iran's increasingly aggressive rhetoric, officials told the Washington Free Beacon that the United States continues to uphold its commitments under the deal and will continue to do so.

"I'm not going to comment on every statement by an Iranian official," a State Department official told the Free Beacon after reviewing Iran's accusations. "The United States continues to meet its commitments under the JCPOA and will hold Iran strictly accountable for its commitments."

One veteran congressional adviser who has helped craft Iran policy during the last two administrations told the Free Beacon the Islamic Republic's latest moves are meant to distract from its widespread cheating on the nuclear accord.

"Iran was never going to stay in the deal the full time," the source said. "They were going to cheat as much as they could, pocket as much as they could, and then bail as soon as anyone tried to enforce the deal."

As the Trump administration works to tighten the deal and hold Iran accountable for its continued nuclear endeavors, Tehran may see an opportunity to abandon the deal before its clandestine activities are exposed.

"Now they see the Trump administration is working to fix the verification loopholes in the agreement, so they know the clock is ticking on how much longer they can cheat with impunity," the source said. "So of course they're already making up excuses to leave and fabricating U.S. violations."

The Trump administration's efforts to hold Iran accountable for its repeated violations of the deal, as well as its support for regional terrorism, has sparked outrage among Iranian leaders, who have lashed out at the U.S. president in vitriolic terms and vowed that Iran will continue its massive military buildup.

"We have previously declared, and once again we declare that the defense capabilities of the country are non-negotiable and not to be bargained for," Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday.

Khamenei promised to continue building Iran's ballistic missile program, which has been an ongoing source of international tension.

"That they ask, why we have some defense facility, why we produce them, or why do we conduct research; these matters are non-negotiable!" Khamenei was quoted as saying. "We won't negotiate with the enemy on matters that provide us with our national sovereignty."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; irandeal; iranenemy; iranophobia; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Tehran accuses U.S. of 18 violations of nuclear agreement

Like their American lib/Dem bedfellows, Iran projects like crazy.

1 posted on 10/26/2017 10:58:21 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

18?

What happened? Did we miss a payment to them?


2 posted on 10/26/2017 11:01:42 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; All

How can they “abandon” something they never signed in the first place?

And interesting they cite “18 violations”, given who the national socialists say whose name that number represents.


3 posted on 10/26/2017 11:04:30 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1; Mr. Mojo

18 is the number of 2 week periods that President Trump has been in office; In their view, we violated the agreement by electing him and not Hillary. Of course, I don’t think they had any intention to comply with the agreement when they signed it.


4 posted on 10/26/2017 11:05:32 AM PDT by GreyFriar ((Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

What are they doing now, trolling Hillary? Wonderful, a pissing contest between Hillary and the Mullahs on who is the most dishonest.

I say crap hits the fan by 1 Jan. They don’t like fighting in the heat.


5 posted on 10/26/2017 11:05:33 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; RushIsMyTeddyBear; metmom; CynicalBear; SkyPilot; tuffydoodle; tang-soo; righttackle44; ..

[ Khamenei promised to continue building Iran’s ballistic missile program, which has been an ongoing source of international tension. ]

I’m sure he did.


6 posted on 10/26/2017 11:06:35 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

I don’t think there is anyone on the planet, including the signatories and authors, that knows what compliance would have actually been. It was a box to check and news story to run in an attempt to have a legacy of some accomplishment for Obama.

I don’t think there was ever any expectation that anything would be made safer or thwart Iran from accomplishing their goals.


7 posted on 10/26/2017 11:10:19 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

We should violate obamas agreement by bombing Iran and killing their leaders.


8 posted on 10/26/2017 11:10:23 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

I concur.


9 posted on 10/26/2017 11:12:24 AM PDT by GreyFriar ((Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Iran wants to repudiate the deal?

That’s like telling your boss that you quit right after he fires you.

CC


10 posted on 10/26/2017 11:18:30 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (It don't matter if your heart is in the right place, if at the same time your head is up your a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Lets face facts and the strategic realities behind the “nuclear agreement”. When Iran obtained state of the art stealthy Chinese made shore to ship missiles, complete with encrypted American designed guidance systems courtesy of the Clinton Administration, they fortified the shores of the narrow shallow Persian Gulf. In the event of shooting, perhaps brought on by an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, the big blue water capital ships of the US Navy faced a debacle in the Gulf worse than Pearl Harbor in less than 15 minutes. Those missiles, designed by the Chinese to control the Taiwan Straits, would have a flight time to target of less than 30 seconds. Also the Iranians have deployed mobile stealthy land to land missiles threatening Israel. the Israelis no doubt have good intelligence and would try to destroy them before an attack on Iran but they probably have concluded that they cannot destroy all and their “iron dome” anti missile system might not be effective. Just three or four of those missiles striking population centers like Tel Aviv or Hebron would be catastrophic. Face it. The Chinese who view all of Asia as their domain saw an opportunity in Iran to put the US and Israel on the defensive and exercised it.Today’s Chinese leaders, not unlike the leaders of Japan in the 1930’s, bitterly resent Westerners interfering economically, diplomatically and militarily in Asian affairs. Far fetched? Reflect a bit on what has and is happening.


11 posted on 10/26/2017 11:29:30 AM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
As if the the 9th Century knuckledraggers in Tehran ever stopped,or even *slowed down*,their program.
12 posted on 10/26/2017 11:35:59 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Obama and Hillary's deliberate intentions were to appease the Russians, despite all their smoke & mirrors huffing and puffing. Iran and North Korea are Putin's pawns. Doesn't require a great leap of logic to tie all of this together.

Sen. D’Amato Drops Bomb: Hillary Allowed Russia to Take Ownership of US Uranium to Sell to Iran

Jim Hoft
Jul 3rd, 2016

Former Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. D’Amato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.

Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran!

Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, “What?”

It’s true.
In January 2013, Pravda celebrated the Russian atomic energy agency’s purchase of the company “Uranium One” in Canada.

That same company, Uranium One, owned uranium concessions in the United States. Because uranium is a strategically important commodity, the Russians would need approval from the Obama administration, including Hillary’s State Department, before the purchase took place.

Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval.

The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. (Via Breitbart)

The New York Times reported on the crooked deal in 2015.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And then there’s this...

Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) told Greta Van Susteren the deal Hillary approved gave Putin ownership of 20 percent of US uranium and Russia sells uranium to unfriendly countries, including Iran.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/senator-damato-drops-bomb-hillary-allowed-russia-take-ownership-us-uranium-sell-iran-video/

______________________________________________________________

Obama allowing Iran to purchase uranium from Russia

Daniel Horowitz | January 10, 2017

Remember those side deals Obama forged with Iran that were not part of the text of the official treaty? Now we are finding out some of the details.

Yesterday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Iranian officials confirmed they have received at least $10 billion in cash, commodities, and assets from Washington since 2013. And that is likely a conservative estimate.

But cash is not the only thing the Islamic Republic of Iran is receiving for gracing us with their willingness to sign onto our own capitulation.

The AP is reporting that Russia, with the support of President Obama, is shipping Iran 116 metric tons of natural uranium.

While Iranian officials have obviously declined to disclose the use of such uranium, AP notes that this is enough to enrich weapons-grade uranium for nuclear bombs:

“Despite present restrictions on its enrichment program, however, the amount of natural uranium is significant should Iran decide to keep it in storage, considering its potential uses once some limits on Tehran’s nuclear activities start to expire in less than a decade.

David Albright, whose Institute of Science and International Security often briefs U.S. lawmakers on Iran’s nuclear program, says the shipment could be enriched to enough weapons-grade uranium for more than 10 simple nuclear bombs, “depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon.” ...”

See more at:
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/obama-allowing-iran-to-purchase-uranium-from-russia-will-tillerson-reverse-course#sthash.guYPvONI.dpuf

____________________________________________________________________

Aug 2015

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
___________________________________________________

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html

13 posted on 10/26/2017 11:51:15 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Nukes. See my FR page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Bttt.

5.56mm


14 posted on 10/26/2017 11:56:50 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ETL

This actually makes me sick.

We paid Iran so they could buy our Uranium from Russia.

Brilliant.


15 posted on 10/26/2017 12:26:22 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/washington_free_beacon/

“The Washington Free Beacon describes itself as “a nonprofit online newspaper.” Published by the Center for American Freedom (CAF), a right-wing advocacy group chaired by media pundit and political strategist Michael Goldfarb, the Beacon has close ties to the neoconservative flagship journal the Weekly Standard. The Standard’s contributing editor Matthew Continetti serves as the Beacon’s editor and chief, while Standard editor Bill Kristol sits on CAF’s board.”

These are just the same old neocons pushing the same old war with Iran they have been pushing for many years.


16 posted on 10/26/2017 12:30:56 PM PDT by WatchungEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Deliberate sabotage on the part of the former hate-America prez.


17 posted on 10/26/2017 12:38:02 PM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Nukes. See my FR page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1; ETL; SkyPilot; Roman_War_Criminal; Travis McGee; Diogenesis; Lera; 444Flyer; Liz; ...

[Former Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. D’Amato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.]

Obama knew what he was doing. Obama and Eric Holder knew what Hillary was doing. Yes, a whole criminal enterprise they had going on there.


18 posted on 10/26/2017 12:55:20 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WatchungEagle

I wonder who the idiot was who added “iranophobia” to the key words for this thread? Any idea?


19 posted on 10/26/2017 1:04:32 PM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Nukes. See my FR page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

We’re dealing with Iranian bumpins who got used handling our previous, more ‘sophisticated’ president using a crude Persian bazaar hustle. Time to change the game.


20 posted on 10/26/2017 1:11:19 PM PDT by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson