Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

Its an example of the ***utter incompetence*** of our higher military leaders these days.

The ground force was too small, and it was forbidden from using supporting arms, artillery and air support. There was no reserve force. And the solution when this tiny force gets pinned down, is to pack a Chinook full of Seals and send them into the fight, at night. Despite todays hit movies, SEALs and SF are really not at their best as a platoon sized infantry element in an open battle.

Its a misuse of SF and SEAL units. Its crappy use of the rangers that got into trouble.

They aren’t as sexy, but regular army or marine formations, with proper supporting arms is the answer to a fight like that. Not a SF or SEAL platoon.

Its the recent disease of everything needing to be spec ops, and done on the cheap.


8 posted on 10/25/2017 4:50:04 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

Well stated. A heavy infantry platoon has much more firepower and sustainment capability than the sexy spec ops folks.

Sometimes you do need a bigger hammer- and an anvil


16 posted on 10/25/2017 5:32:30 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson