Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Once again a case of not reading the OP article.

This no “win.”

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria only ruled on the basis of harm to consumers. The decision on the facts of the case wont come til 2018.

All he did was look at consumers based on the CA argument. Had he found sufficient harm - if CA had not ironically undercut their case by moving to mitigate the effect to consumers in anticipation of the Trump order - he would likely have ruled differently.

Read the articles, folks. (not preaching...I sometimes hit-n-run comment on the excerpt as well)


14 posted on 10/25/2017 2:44:22 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

So he denied the injunction but allowed the case to move forward. Happens all the time. Obmacare may very well collapse before the court can render a decision on the merits.


15 posted on 10/25/2017 2:53:33 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson