Posted on 10/24/2017 3:50:36 PM PDT by kristinn
There is another question. How did it end up in the hands of the FBI?
As someone who knows how newsrooms work I can assure you you're right. If the WaPo was sitting on the story, they know the secret's now out and don't want to be scooped or accused of complicity.
Why is Martha Maccallum not even mentioning this on FNC??? Leads with the boring Flake rant......
The question is: did the DNC break any laws doing this? Probably NOT....sleazy, underhanded, dirty etc. Then of course, did any admin officials break any laws? Not seeing it. Just more hypocrisy.
I didn’t think this obvious fact would be disclosed by a progressive newspaper. Hilary is losing all her support. That is “What Happened”.
P's papa.
A limited hangout or partial hangout is, according to former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency Victor Marchetti, "spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further."
In a March 22, 1973 meeting between Richard Nixon, John Dean, John Ehrlichman, John Mitchell, and H. R. Haldeman, Ehrlichman incorporated the term into a new and related one, "modified limited hangout"
The phrase was coined in the following exchange:
PRESIDENT: You think, you think we want to, want to go this route now? And the — let it hang out, so to speak?
DEAN: Well, it's, it isn't really that —
HALDEMAN: It's a limited hang out.
DEAN: It's a limited hang out.
EHRLICHMAN: It's a modified limited hang out.
PRESIDENT: Well, it's only the questions of the thing hanging out publicly or privately.
wikipedia
It was the Bushes. Why does W find his long lost voice?
and Podestaaaaaaa (whose emails we have)
“Maybe the Clintons have become too big a liability to the Deep State.”
Bingo. They’ve decided to take the risk that they can use the Clintons as a firebreak.
It will probably work for a while. The problem is, it will discredit them and their propaganda machine so badly, they’ll lose the power to control the news. And then they’ll lose the 2018 elections. And then they’ll lose the 2020 elections. And then they’ll lose the redistricting battles.
And at some point, all that losing will destroy the firebreak.
Mr. Tippy Toes....’I paid for the urinating prostitute fiction, please clap...’
Who exactly broke this story? I know it’s the WAPO but where did they get the info.
That is the very selfsame lawfirm and attorney (Elias) who represented Obama in all the “birther” suits. Crooked as it gets. The very bottom of the swamp, all in bed with Clinton/Obama/DNC and GOPe.
Levin dedicating hour to this on his show
My guess is most FR’s had that connection was made. What is surprising is Wapoo breaking story
Two thoughts:
1. This was released to weaken any court action to order release of Fusion GPS complete billing records. This means there’s something worse than this in them.
2. Mueller will indict somebody this week to give the media another story to focus on.
Bonus round: the Uranium One stuff is really really incriminating and this is a distraction. Releasing this will allow the media to mix the two “Russia” stories together and put the uranium story down the memory hole.
We know that from the lips of the person who gave it to them. After he dispatched an aide to England to pick up a copy.
John McCain
It was leaked to WP hoping for a spin.
I agree with you, that this has the smell of the Bush cabal all over it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.